Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Teaching motivators, facilitators, and barriers among dermatology volunteer clinical faculty.
Delgado, Francisco; Immaneni, Supriya; MacKelfresh, Jamie B; Yeung, Howa.
Afiliación
  • Delgado F; Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1525 Clifton Rd, Suite 100, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Immaneni S; Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1525 Clifton Rd, Suite 100, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • MacKelfresh JB; Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1525 Clifton Rd, Suite 100, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Yeung H; Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1525 Clifton Rd, Suite 100, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. howa.yeung@emory.edu.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 315(10): 2995-2998, 2023 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37750929
ABSTRACT
Volunteer clinical faculty in private practice provide important clinical teaching and mentorship to dermatology residency programs. Motivations for serving as volunteer clinical faculty in specialties such as obstetrics and gynecology, emergency medicine, and family medicine have been identified; however, there is limited data on what drives private practice physicians to volunteer to teach in dermatology residency training programs. This study examined motivators, facilitators, and barriers to serving as volunteer clinical faculty using an anonymous survey of dermatologists, Mohs surgeons, and dermatopathologists affiliated with Emory University's dermatology residency program. Among the 38 invited participants, 26 (68%) completed the survey. The types of practices represented include general dermatology (71%), Mohs surgery (23%), cosmetic dermatology (58%), and dermatopathology (27%). Traditional lectures and impromptu teaching sessions were the most utilized teaching modalities, with 14 (54%) and 11 (42%) of respondents reporting usage, respectively. Most respondents ranked altruistic statements such as "opportunity to be helpful to others" (26, 100%), "providing service to the field of dermatology" (25, 96%), and "enjoyment of teaching" (25, 96%) as important motivations. In contrast, extrinsic rewards such as career advancement and increased income were rated as least important. Significant barriers included limited time for travel and teaching and credentialing. Proposed facilitators included promoting schedule flexibility, increasing teaching supplies, and streamlining credentialing. This single-center study may have limited generalizability to other residency programs with varying characteristics. The motivators, facilitators, and barriers identified by this survey can inform dermatology residency programs on how to maximize volunteer clinical faculty recruitment, retention, and engagement, thus strengthening clinical teaching and mentorship offered.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dermatología / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Dermatol Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dermatología / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arch Dermatol Res Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos