Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Automatic 3D Postoperative Evaluation of Complex Orthopaedic Interventions.
Ackermann, Joëlle; Hoch, Armando; Snedeker, Jess Gerrit; Zingg, Patrick Oliver; Esfandiari, Hooman; Fürnstahl, Philipp.
Afiliación
  • Ackermann J; Research in Orthopedic Computer Science, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hoch A; Laboratory for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Snedeker JG; Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Zingg PO; Laboratory for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Esfandiari H; Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Fürnstahl P; Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Imaging ; 9(9)2023 Aug 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37754944
In clinical practice, image-based postoperative evaluation is still performed without state-of-the-art computer methods, as these are not sufficiently automated. In this study we propose a fully automatic 3D postoperative outcome quantification method for the relevant steps of orthopaedic interventions on the example of Periacetabular Osteotomy of Ganz (PAO). A typical orthopaedic intervention involves cutting bone, anatomy manipulation and repositioning as well as implant placement. Our method includes a segmentation based deep learning approach for detection and quantification of the cuts. Furthermore, anatomy repositioning was quantified through a multi-step registration method, which entailed a coarse alignment of the pre- and postoperative CT images followed by a fine fragment alignment of the repositioned anatomy. Implant (i.e., screw) position was identified by 3D Hough transform for line detection combined with fast voxel traversal based on ray tracing. The feasibility of our approach was investigated on 27 interventions and compared against manually performed 3D outcome evaluations. The results show that our method can accurately assess the quality and accuracy of the surgery. Our evaluation of the fragment repositioning showed a cumulative error for the coarse and fine alignment of 2.1 mm. Our evaluation of screw placement accuracy resulted in a distance error of 1.32 mm for screw head location and an angular deviation of 1.1° for screw axis. As a next step we will explore generalisation capabilities by applying the method to different interventions.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Imaging Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Imaging Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza Pais de publicación: Suiza