Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating Goldberger's triad as a marker of congestive heart failure: A systematic review and retrospective study.
Saraiya, Avinash; Yu, Julia; Huang, Christina; Frisch, Daniel; Pavri, Behzad B.
Afiliación
  • Saraiya A; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Yu J; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Huang C; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Frisch D; Division of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Pavri BB; Division of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. Electronic address: behzad.pavri@jefferson.edu.
J Electrocardiol ; 81: 207-213, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37783013
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 1982, Drs. Barold and Goldberger described an ECG triad associated with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) consisting of high precordial QRS voltage, low limb lead voltage, and poor precordial R wave progression. Studies have since attempted to replicate the originally reported sensitivity (70%), specificity (>99%), and positive predictive value (PPV, 100%) of Goldberger's triad (GT) with variable results.

PURPOSE:

To assess sensitivity, specificity and PPV of GT as a screening tool for LVD in the current era.

METHODS:

We performed (1) A systematic review of the published studies; (2) Searched our hospital ECG database (GE MUSE) for diagnoses of "low limb-voltage" and "left ventricular hypertrophy" from 2017 to 2022; identified ECGs were analyzed for GT criteria and their medical records were screened for LVD. (3) ECG analysis of patients with known idiopathic LVD for the GT.

RESULTS:

A total of 11,115 patients from 8 studies were included in the systematic review of published studies and showed widely varying sensitivity, specificity and PPV. A total of 4576 ECGs (in GE MUSE) from 372 patients met initial screening criteria of low limb lead voltage and LVH; only 12 patients had ECGs that satisfied GT. Of these 12, only 1 patient had evidence of LVD, yielding a PPV of 8%. Finally, of the 40 patients with known LVD, only 1 met the ECG criteria for GT, resulting in a sensitivity of 2.5%.

CONCLUSION:

Our literature review does not support the original results of GT. ECGs from our database that met GT (searched by low limb-voltage and left ventricular hypertrophy) over a span of 5 years were rare. When present, the PPV of GT was 8%. In patients with established LVD, the sensitivity was 2.5%. These data do not validate GT as tool to identify LVD in the current era.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Electrocardiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Electrocardiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos