Technique and Outcomes of Concomitant Aortic and Caval Resection and Reconstruction for Retroperitoneal Tumors.
Ann Vasc Surg
; 98: 251-257, 2024 Jan.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-37805168
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Major vascular involvement is often considered a contraindication to resection of malignant tumors, but in highly selected patients, it can be performed safely, with results that are highly dependent upon the tumor biology. Resection of both the aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC) is a rare undertaking, requiring both favorable tumor biology and a patient fit for a substantial surgical insult; nevertheless, it provides the possibility of a cure.METHODS:
Patients requiring resection and reconstruction of both the aorta and IVC from 2009 through 2019 at 2 university medical centers were included. Patient characteristics, operative technique, and outcomes were retrospectively collected.RESULTS:
We identified 9 patients, all with infrarenal reconstruction or repair of the aorta and IVC. All cases were performed with systemic heparinization and required simultaneous aortic and caval cross-clamping for tumor resection. No temporary venous or arterial bypass was used. Since arterial reperfusion with the IVC clamped was poorly tolerated in 1 patient, venous reconstruction was typically completed first. Primary repair was performed in 1 patient, while 8 required replacements. In 2 patients, aortic homograft was used for replacement of both the aortoiliac and iliocaval segments in contaminated surgical fields. In the remaining 6, Dacron was used for arterial replacement; either Dacron (n = 2) or polytetrafluoroethylene (n = 4) were used for venous replacement. Patients were discharged after a median stay of 8 days (range 5-16). At median follow-up of 17 months (range 3-79 months), 2 patients with paraganglioma and 1 patient with Leydig cell carcinoma had cancer recurrences. Venous reconstructions occluded in 3 patients (38%), although symptoms were minimal. One patient presented acutely with a thrombosed iliac artery limb and bilateral common iliac artery anastomotic stenoses, treated successfully with thrombolysis and stenting.CONCLUSIONS:
Patients with tumor involving both the aorta and IVC can be successfully treated with resection and reconstruction. En bloc tumor resection, restoration of venous return before arterial reconstruction, and most importantly, careful patient selection, all contribute to positive outcomes in this otherwise incurable population.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Neoplasias Retroperitoneales
/
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular
Tipo de estudio:
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Ann Vasc Surg
Asunto de la revista:
ANGIOLOGIA
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article