Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The moderating effects of sex, age, and education on the outcome of combined cognitive training and transcranial electrical stimulation in older adults.
Krebs, Christine; Peter, Jessica; Brill, Esther; Klöppel, Stefan; Brem, Anna-Katharine.
Afiliación
  • Krebs C; University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Peter J; University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Brill E; University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Klöppel S; Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Brem AK; University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Psychol ; 14: 1243099, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37809311
ABSTRACT
Computerized cognitive training (CCT) has been shown to improve cognition in older adults via targeted exercises for single or multiple cognitive domains. Combining CCT with non-invasive brain stimulation is thought to be even more effective due to synergistic effects in the targeted brain areas and networks. However, little is known about the moderating effects of sex, age, and education on cognitive outcomes. Here, we investigated these factors in a randomized, double-blind study in which we administered CCT either combined with transcranial direct (tDCS), alternating (tACS) current stimulation or sham stimulation. 59 healthy older participants (mean age 71.7 ± 6.1) received either tDCS (2 mA), tACS (5 Hz), or sham stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the first 20 min of a CCT (10 sessions, 50 min, twice weekly). Before and after the complete cognitive intervention, a neuropsychological assessment was performed, and the test scores were summarized in a composite score. Our results showed a significant three-way interaction between age, years of education, and stimulation technique (F(6,52) = 5.53, p = 0.007), indicating that the oldest participants with more years of education particularly benefitted from tDCS compared to the sham group, while in the tACS group the youngest participants with less years of education benefit more from the stimulation. These results emphasize the importance of further investigating and taking into account sex, age, and education as moderating factors in the development of individualized stimulation protocols. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03475446.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza