Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Antiplatelet Monotherapies After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention According to Clinical, Ischemic, and Bleeding Risks.
Yang, Seokhun; Kang, Jeehoon; Park, Kyung Woo; Hur, Seung-Ho; Lee, Nam Ho; Hwang, Doyeon; Yang, Han-Mo; Ahn, Hyo-Suk; Cha, Kwang Soo; Jo, Sang-Ho; Ryu, Jae Kean; Suh, Il-Woo; Choi, Hyun-Hee; Woo, Seong-Ill; Han, Jung-Kyu; Shin, Eun-Seok; Koo, Bon-Kwon; Kim, Hyo-Soo.
Afiliación
  • Yang S; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang J; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park KW; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kwparkmd@snu.ac.kr.
  • Hur SH; Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: shur@dsmc.or.kr.
  • Lee NH; Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Hwang D; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Yang HM; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ahn HS; Uijeongbu St Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea.
  • Cha KS; Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  • Jo SH; Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
  • Ryu JK; Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Suh IW; Anyang SAM Medical Center, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
  • Choi HH; Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Woo SI; Inha University Hospital, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Han JK; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Shin ES; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
  • Koo BK; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HS; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 82(16): 1565-1578, 2023 10 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37821166
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Clopidogrel was superior to aspirin monotherapy in secondary prevention after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefits of clopidogrel across high-risk subgroups

METHODS:

This was a post hoc analysis of the HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of coronary artery diseases-EXtended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) trial that randomly assigned patients who were event free for 6 to 18 months post-PCI on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy. Two clinical risk scores were used for risk stratification the DAPT score and the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) (the sum of age ≥75 years, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, peripheral artery disease, stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, heart failure, and renal dysfunction). The primary composite endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission because of acute coronary syndrome, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥3) at 2 years after randomization.

RESULTS:

Among 5,403 patients, clopidogrel monotherapy showed a lower rate of the primary composite endpoint than aspirin monotherapy (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59-0.90). The benefit of clopidogrel over aspirin was consistent regardless of TRS 2°P (high TRS 2°P [≥3] group HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.44-0.96]; and low TRS 2°P [<3] group HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.60-0.99]) (P for interaction = 0.454) and regardless of DAPT score (high DAPT score [≥2] group HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.46-1.00]; and low DAPT score [<2] group HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.59-0.96]) (P for interaction = 0.662). The association was similar for the individual outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

The beneficial effect of clopidogrel over aspirin monotherapy was consistent regardless of clinical risk or relative ischemic and bleeding risks compared with aspirin monotherapy. (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis- EXtended Antiplatelet Monotherapy [HOST-EXAM]; NCT02044250).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidente Cerebrovascular / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Cardiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidente Cerebrovascular / Intervención Coronaria Percutánea / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Cardiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article