Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What do readers want? Results of an online survey to involve readers in updating the seventh edition of the Manual of dietetic practice.
Wedlake, Linda; Mellor, Duane; Marriott, Tom; Maslin, Kate; Frost, Gary; Hickson, Mary.
Afiliación
  • Wedlake L; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Mellor D; Aston Medical School, Birmingham, UK.
  • Marriott T; Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  • Maslin K; School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
  • Frost G; Department of Metabolism, Digestion & Reproduction, Imperial College, London, UK.
  • Hickson M; School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 37(1): 280-291, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37840226
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Manual of dietetic practice ('Manual') is the core textbook for qualified and student dietitians. A survey was conducted to explore views on the scope, content and presentation of the Manual to inform the forthcoming edition.

METHODS:

The survey comprised of questions on demographics, structure, content, access (print/digital), missing topics, strengths and weaknesses. It was distributed to members of the British Dietetic Association (BDA) and other relevant groups in August 2022. Responses are presented as frequencies and free text as themes.

RESULTS:

Of 1179 responses, 91% were from professionals, of whom 72% were registered dietitians with a mean of 12.7 years (range 1-44) in practice 60% worked in the United Kingdom with 52% based in a clinical setting. The printed version was preferred 59% professionals, 60% students, 94% professionals and 88% students were satisfied with the structure; however, 26% professionals and 22% students identified content that was lacking or outdated, including mental health and sustainability. The strengths were its comprehensive coverage and respected contributing authors. Weaknesses included the cost, size, lack of visual aids and currency. Professionals indicated the seventh edition should focus on more practical information required for clinical practice, whereas students wanted more emphasis on summarised information and visual formats.

CONCLUSIONS:

The survey proved a valuable method to engage with the readership to ensure the next edition reflected their requirements. Although nearly all respondents were satisfied with the scope and content, the results highlighted those topics lacking and/or outdated. Results also showed that the next edition should focus on practical information required for clinical practice, with more summarised and visual formats.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dietética / Nutricionistas Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Hum Nutr Diet Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dietética / Nutricionistas Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Hum Nutr Diet Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido