Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lateral Prefrontal Stimulation of Active Cortex With Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Affects Subsequent Engagement of the Frontoparietal Network.
Taylor, Stephan F; Gu, Pan; Simmonite, Molly; Lasagna, Carly; Tso, Ivy F; Lee, Taraz G; Vesia, Michael; Hernandez-Garcia, Luis.
Afiliación
  • Taylor SF; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: sftaylor@umich.edu.
  • Gu P; Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas.
  • Simmonite M; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Lasagna C; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Tso IF; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Lee TG; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Vesia M; School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Hernandez-Garcia L; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37918508
BACKGROUND: A critical unanswered question about therapeutic transcranial magnetic stimulation is what patients should do during treatment to optimize its effectiveness. Here, we address this lack of knowledge in healthy participants, testing the hypotheses that stimulating the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) while participants perform a working memory task will provide stronger effects on subsequent activation, perfusion, connectivity, and performance than stimulating resting dlPFC. METHODS: After a baseline functional magnetic resonance imaging session to localize dlPFC activation and the associated frontoparietal network (FPN) engaged by an n-back task, healthy participants (N = 40, 67.5% female) underwent 3 counterbalanced sessions, separated by several weeks, during which they received intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) followed by magnetic resonance imaging scans as follows: 1) iTBS to the dlPFC while resting passively (passive), 2) iTBS to the dlPFC while performing the n-back task (active), and 3) iTBS to a vertex site, while not engaged in the n-back task and resting passively (control). RESULTS: We found no difference in n-back performance between the 3 conditions. However, FPN activation was reduced while performing the n-back task in the active condition relative to the passive and control conditions. There was no differential activity in the FPN on comparing passive with control conditions, i.e., there was no effect of the site of stimulation. We found no effects of state or site of stimulation on perfusion or connectivity with the dlPFC. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the state of the brain while receiving iTBS affected FPN activation, possibly reflecting greater efficiency of FPN network activation when participants were stimulated while engaging the FPN.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corteza Prefrontal / Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corteza Prefrontal / Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos