Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the Accuracy of Spinal Instrumentation Using Augmented Reality (AR): A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.
Pahwa, Bhavya; Azad, Tej D; Liu, Jiaqi; Ran, Kathleen; Liu, Connor J; Tracz, Jovanna; Sattari, Shahab Aldin; Khalifeh, Jawad M; Judy, Brendan F; Bydon, Ali; Witham, Timothy F.
Afiliación
  • Pahwa B; University College of Medical Sciences, GTB Hospital, New Delhi 110095, India.
  • Azad TD; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Liu J; School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
  • Ran K; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Liu CJ; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Tracz J; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Sattari SA; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Khalifeh JM; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Judy BF; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Bydon A; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Witham TF; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
J Clin Med ; 12(21)2023 Oct 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37959207
ABSTRACT
Technological advancements, particularly in the realm of augmented reality (AR), may facilitate more accurate and precise pedicle screw placement. AR integrates virtual data into the operator's real-world view, allowing for the visualization of patient-specific anatomy and navigated trajectories. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using AR-based systems. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE database, including studies reporting the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using AR. In total, 8 studies with 163 patients and 1259 screws were included in the analysis. XVision (XVS) was the most commonly used AR system (595 screws) followed by the Allura AR surgical navigation system (ARSN) (462 screws). The overall accuracy was calculated as 97.2% (95% CI 96.2-98.1% p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy rates achieved by XVS and Allura ARSN (p = 0.092). AR enables reliable, accurate placement of spinal instrumentation. Future research efforts should focus on comparative studies, cost effectiveness, operative time, and radiation exposure.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India