Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Establishing national clinical diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for CT examinations in Brazil: A prospective study.
Oliveira Bernardo, Mônica; Karout, Lina; Morgado, Flávio; Ebrahimian, Shadi; Sarmet Santos, Alair; Amorim, Clarissa; Muniz Filho, Hilton; Moscatelli, Antonio; Francisco Muglia, Valdair; Schroeder, Henrique; Moulin Sales, Danilo; Gandolpho Henschel, Renan; Giovanni Valese, Bruno; Kiipper, Felipe; Cesar Cavalcanti, Publio; Lucena, Ronaldo; Jornada, Tiago; de Paula, Valnir; Zago, Marcel; Varella, Ricardo; Anes, Mauricio; Márcio Alves Pinheiro, Antonio; Claúdio de Moura Carvalho, Luiz; Santana de Melo Tapajos, Juliana; Antonio de Almeida, Fernando; Applegate, Kimberly; Paulo, Graciano; Roberto Costa, Paulo.
Afiliación
  • Oliveira Bernardo M; Hospital Miguel Soeiro, Pontificia University Catholic of São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: bernardomonica004@gmail.com.
  • Karout L; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: lkarout@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Morgado F; Pontificia University Catholic of São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: fmorgado.sp@gmail.com.
  • Ebrahimian S; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Elmhurst Hospital Center, Elmhurst, NY, USA. Electronic address: shadi.ebrahimian@yale.edu.
  • Sarmet Santos A; Complexo Hospitalar de Niterói, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Electronic address: alairsarmet@id.uff.br.
  • Amorim C; Complexo Hospitalar de Niterói, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Electronic address: clarissa-amorim@hotmail.com.
  • Muniz Filho H; Hospital HCOR, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: hiltonmlf@gmail.com.
  • Moscatelli A; Hospital Miguel Soeiro, Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: antonio.moscatelli@unimedsorocaba.coop.br.
  • Francisco Muglia V; Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Electronic address: valdair.muglia@gmail.com.
  • Schroeder H; Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. Electronic address: henriquehsdx@gmail.com.
  • Moulin Sales D; Top Imagem Medicina Diagnóstica, Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: salesdanilo00@gmail.com.
  • Gandolpho Henschel R; Top Imagem Medicina Diagnóstica, Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: renan.gh@hotmail.com.
  • Giovanni Valese B; Top Imagem Medicina Diagnóstica, Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: bvalese@hotmail.com.
  • Kiipper F; Hospital Sírio Libanes, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: felipe.mkiipper@hsl.org.br.
  • Cesar Cavalcanti P; Hospital Sírio Libanes, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: publio.viana@hsl.org.br.
  • Lucena R; Unimed Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: rona.lucena@gmail.com.
  • Jornada T; Hospital das Clínicas de Recife, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Electronic address: tiagosjornada@gmail.com.
  • de Paula V; DIX Diagnóstico por Imagem, Santa Maria, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: supervisao@diximagem.com.br.
  • Zago M; DIX Diagnóstico por Imagem, Santa Maria, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: marcelzb@gmail.com.
  • Varella R; Hospital Unimed de Vitória, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Electronic address: ricardoqvarella@hotmail.com.
  • Anes M; Hospital das Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: manes@hcpa.edu.br.
  • Márcio Alves Pinheiro A; Unimed Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: antonio.pinheiro@unimedpoa.com.br.
  • Claúdio de Moura Carvalho L; Hospital Universitario Júlio Muller, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Electronic address: luizclaudiocba1@gmail.com.
  • Santana de Melo Tapajos J; Hospital Samel, Manaus, Amazona, Brazil. Electronic address: juliana@telemel.com.br.
  • Antonio de Almeida F; Pontificia University Catholic of São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: faalmeida@pucsp.br.
  • Applegate K; University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Lexington, KY, USA. Electronic address: keapple5123@gmail.com.
  • Paulo G; Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde do Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: gpaulo@icloud.com.
  • Roberto Costa P; IFUSP - Instituto de Física da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: pcosta@if.usp.br.
Eur J Radiol ; 169: 111191, 2023 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37976761
PURPOSE: Diagnostic reference levels (DRL) and achievable doses (AD) are important tools for radiation dose optimization. Therefore, a prospective study was performed which aimed to establish a multi-parametric, clinical indication based - DRL(DRLCI) and clinical indication - AD (ADCI) for adult CT in Brazil. METHODS: The prospective study included 4787 patients (50 ± 18 years old; male:female 2041:2746) at 13 Brazilian sites that have been submitted to head, paranasal sinus, cervical spine, chest, or abdomen-pelvis CT between January and October 2021 for 13 clinical indications. The sites provided the following information: patient age, gender, weight, height, body mass index[BMI], clinical indications, scanner information(vendor, model, detector configuration), scan parameters (number of scan phases, kV, mA, pitch) and dose-related quantities (CT dose index volume- CTDIvol, dose length product- DLP). Median(AD) and 75th(DRL) percentile CTDIvol and DLP values were estimated for each body region and clinical indications. Non-normal data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: In majority of Brazilian sites, body region and clinical indications based DRLs were at or lower than the corresponding DRLs in the US and higher than Europe. Although radiation doses varied significantly for patients in different body mass index groups (p < 0.001), within each body region, there were no differences in radiation doses for different clinical indications (p > 0.1). Radiation doses for 7/13 clinical indications were higher using iterative reconstruction technique than for the filtered back projection. CONCLUSIONS: There was substantial variation in Brazil DRLCI across different institutions with higher doses compared to the European standards. There was also a lack of clinical indication-based protocol and dose optimization based on different clinical indications for the same body region.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Niveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Radiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Niveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Radiol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Irlanda