Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.
Shanshan, Hong; Liying, Chen; Huihong, Zhuang; Yanting, Wang; Tiantian, Lin; Tong, Jin; Jiawei, Qin.
Afiliación
  • Shanshan H; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Quan Zhou Women's and Children's Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
  • Liying C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Quan Zhou Women's and Children's Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
  • Huihong Z; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
  • Yanting W; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Quan Zhou Women's and Children's Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
  • Tiantian L; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
  • Tong J; Gynecological Minimally Invasive Center, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Jiawei Q; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 103(2): 225-240, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997035
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Lumbopelvic pain (LPP) is common in pregnant women and has a significant negative effect on physical and psychological health. In this study, for the first time, we conduct a meta-analysis to estimate the overall prevalence of LPP among pregnant women and clarify the reasons for the differences in the estimated results. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was conducted from inception until October 2022. Two reviewers conducted a methodological quality assessment. Random-effects model analysis was used to estimate the pooled prevalence and the 95% confidence interval. Chi-square tests and I2 -values were used to assess the heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis (according to the participants' continent, age, body mass index [BMI], gestational age and study risk of bias), sensitivity analysis and random-effects meta-regression were used to explore the the sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS:

Of the 1661 unique citations, 38 studies (21 533 pregnant participants) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of LPP during pregnancy was 63% (95% CI 0.57 to 0.69), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99.1%, P < 0.001). The prevalence differed by participants' continents, 71% (North America), 74% (South America), 63% (Asia), 64% (Europe), 59% (Africa) and 45% (Oceania). The prevalence differed by BMI, 64% (BMI <25), 64% (25 ≤ BMI ≤ 28), and 71% (BMI >28). The prevalence differed by age, 72% (age <25 years), 58% (25 ≤ age ≤ 30 years), and 69% (age >30 years). The prevalence were the same differed by study risk of bias, 63% (both low and moderate risk of bias studies). The prevalence were similar by gestational age, 62% (second trimester) and 63% (third trimester).

CONCLUSIONS:

Lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy is common; about three-fifths of pregnant women experience LPP. More prevention and intervention research for lumbopelvic should be conducted in pregnant women with different clinical characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones del Embarazo / Mujeres Embarazadas Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones del Embarazo / Mujeres Embarazadas Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China