Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is Penicillin Allergy a Clinical Problem? A Systematic Review of Total Joint Arthroplasty Procedures With Implications for Patient Safety and Antibiotic Stewardship.
Porto, Joshua R; Lavu, Monish S; Hecht, Christian J; McNassor, Ryan; Burkhart, Robert J; Kamath, Atul F.
Afiliación
  • Porto JR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Lavu MS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Hecht CJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • McNassor R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan.
  • Burkhart RJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Kamath AF; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
J Arthroplasty ; 2023 Nov 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38040064
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) who report penicillin allergy (PA) are frequently administered second-line antibiotics, although recent evidence suggests that this may be unnecessary and could increase infection risk. Many institutions have aimed to improve antibiotic deployment via allergy testing and screening; however, there is little standardization to this process. This review aimed to evaluate (1) antibiotic selection in patients who report PA and assess the impact of screening and testing interventions, (2) rates of allergic reactions in patients who report PA, and (3) the association between reported PA and screening or testing programs and odds of surgical site infection or periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar electronic databases were searched on February 4, 2023 to identify all studies published since January 1, 2000 that evaluated the impact of PA on patients undergoing TJA (PROSPERO study protocol registration: CRD42023394031). Articles were included if full-text manuscripts in English were available, and the study analyzed the impact of PA and related interventions on TJA patients. There were 11 studies evaluating 1,276,663 patients included. Interventions were compared via presentation of key findings regarding rates of clinically relevant or high-risk PA reported upon screenings or testings, cephalosporin utilizations, allergic reactions, and postoperative infections (surgical site infection and periprosthetic joint infection). RESULTS: All 6 studies found that PA screening and testing markedly increase the use of first-line antibiotics. Testing showed low rates of true allergy (0.7 to 3%) and allergic reaction frequency for patients who have reported PA receiving cephalosporins was between 0% and 2%. Although there were mixed findings across studies, there was a trend toward second-line antibiotic prophylaxis being associated with a slightly higher rate of infection in PA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using PA screening and testing can promote antibiotic stewardship by safely increasing the use of first-line antibiotics in patients who have a reported PA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos