Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Screw Fixation for the Latarjet Procedure May Reduce Risk of Recurrent Instability but Increases Reoperation Rate Compared to Suture-Button Fixation: A Systematic Review.
Maguire, James A; Dhillon, Jaydeep; Sarna, Neil; Keeter, Carson; Scillia, Anthony J; McCulloch, Patrick C; Kraeutler, Matthew J.
Afiliación
  • Maguire JA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, New Jersey, U.S.A.. Electronic address: Jmaguire72094@gmail.com.
  • Dhillon J; Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Greenwood Village, Colorado, U.S.A.
  • Sarna N; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, New Jersey, U.S.A.
  • Keeter C; Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.
  • Scillia AJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, New Jersey, U.S.A.
  • McCulloch PC; Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
  • Kraeutler MJ; Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy ; 2023 Nov 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38040391
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To perform a systematic review to compare clinical outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates of patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure with screw vs suture-button fixation.

METHODS:

A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify clinical studies directly comparing screw vs suture-button fixation for the Latarjet procedure. The search terms used were shoulder screw suture button. Patients were evaluated based on reoperation rate, complication rate, recurrent instability, radiologic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. Graft and screw position were assessed via computed tomography.

RESULTS:

Seven studies (1 Level II, 6 Level III) met inclusion criteria, with 845 patients undergoing the Latarjet procedure with screw fixation (screw group) and 279 patients with suture-button fixation (suture-button group). Mean patient age ranged from 21.2 to 29.6 years. Mean follow-up time ranged from 6.0 to 40.8 months. The recurrent instability rate ranged from 0% to 2.5% in the screw group and 0% to 8.3% in the suture-button group. The reoperation rate ranged from 0% to 7.7% in the screw group compared to 0% to 1.9% in the suture-button group. One study reported significantly lower visual analog scale pain scores in the suture-button group compared with the screw group (1.5 vs 1.2, P = .003). No other studies reported significant differences in any patient-reported outcomes. There was no significant difference in horizontal or vertical graft position, graft union rate, or complication rate between groups in any study.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Latarjet procedure with screw fixation may result in a lower risk of recurrent instability compared to suture-button fixation, although screw fixation may also have a higher reoperation rate due to hardware-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, systematic review of Level II to III studies.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Arthroscopy Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Arthroscopy Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA