Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In situ and in vitro evaluation of two antiseptics for blood bank based on chlorhexidine gluconate/isopropyl alcohol and povidone-iodine.
Sánchez-Guzmán, María de Jesús; Loyola-Cruz, Miguel Ángel; López-Ornelas, Adolfo; Cruz-Cruz, Clemente; Durán-Manuel, Emilio Mariano; Bello-López, Juan Manuel.
Afiliación
  • Sánchez-Guzmán MJ; División de Investigación, Hospital Juárez de México, Mexico City, Mexico; Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Loyola-Cruz MÁ; División de Investigación, Hospital Juárez de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • López-Ornelas A; División de Investigación, Hospital Juárez de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Cruz-Cruz C; División de Investigación, Hospital Juárez de México, Mexico City, Mexico; Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Durán-Manuel EM; División de Investigación, Hospital Juárez de México, Mexico City, Mexico; Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Bello-López JM; División de Investigación, Hospital Juárez de México, Mexico City, Mexico. Electronic address: juanmanuelbello81@hotmail.com.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 63(1): 103854, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061923
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Poor disinfection is the main cause of blood contamination, so its elimination is key to limiting the entry of bacteria into the collection system. With the advancement of antiseptic technology, antiseptics with sterile, disposable applicators are now available.

AIM:

To evaluate in situ two antiseptics (with and without applicators) for blood banks and to demonstrate in vitro antiseptic activity on bacterial biofilms of importance in transfusion medicine.

METHODS:

Antiseptic A (2% sterile solution of chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol provided with applicator) and bulk antiseptic B (10% povidone-iodine) were evaluated. The deferred blood donor arms were subjected to disinfection with antiseptics A and B and the contralateral arms were cultured to determine the baseline bacterial load (control). Antiseptic activity was assessed by ANOVA and logaritmic reduction values (LRV) and percentage reduction values (PRV) were calculated. Finally, the in vitro activity of antiseptic A was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) on biofilm models.

RESULTS:

Prior to disinfection tests, commensal and clinically important bacteria were identified; antiseptic A showed post-disinfection bacterial growth rates of zero compared to controls (p < 0.0001). The frequency of bacterial growth with antiseptic B was 74%. A significant difference was identified between both antiseptics, where antiseptic A showed higher activity (p < 0.5468). LRV and PRV were 0.6-2.5/100% and 0.3-1.7/66.7-99.7% for antiseptics A and B, respectively. Through CLSM, disinfectant A (without applicator) showed lower in vitro antiseptic activity on the tested biofilms at the exposure times recommended by the manufacturer.

CONCLUSIONS:

Sterile solution of chlorhexidine gluconate/isopropyl alcohol with applicator showed advantages disinfection in deferred blood donors over povidone-iodine.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clorhexidina / Antiinfecciosos Locales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transfus Apher Sci Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: México

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clorhexidina / Antiinfecciosos Locales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transfus Apher Sci Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: México