Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
OCT Segmentation Errors with Bruch's Membrane Opening-Minimum Rim Width as Compared with Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness.
Yang, Hongli; Rees, Jack P; Sanchez, Facundo G; Gardiner, Stuart K; Mansberger, Steven L.
Afiliación
  • Yang H; Devers Eye Institute Discoveries in Sight Research Laboratories, Legacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon.
  • Rees JP; Devers Eye Institute Discoveries in Sight Research Laboratories, Legacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon.
  • Sanchez FG; Devers Eye Institute Discoveries in Sight Research Laboratories, Legacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon.
  • Gardiner SK; Devers Eye Institute Discoveries in Sight Research Laboratories, Legacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon.
  • Mansberger SL; Devers Eye Institute Discoveries in Sight Research Laboratories, Legacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: smansberger@deverseye.org.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma ; 7(3): 308-315, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104770
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the magnitude and location of automated segmentation errors of the Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT).

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS:

We included 162 glaucoma suspect or open-angle glaucoma eyes from 162 participants.

METHODS:

We used spectral-domain optic coherence tomography (Spectralis 870 nm, Heidelberg Engineering) to image the optic nerve with 24 radial optic nerve head B-scans and a 12-degree peripapillary circle scan, and exported the native "automated segmentation only" results for BMO-MRW and RNFLT. We also exported the results after "manual refinement" of the measurements. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

We calculated the absolute and proportional error globally and within the 12 30-degree sectors of the optic disc. We determined whether the glaucoma classifications were different between BMO-MRW and RNFLT as a result of manual and automatic segmentation.

RESULTS:

The absolute error mean was larger for BMO-MRW than for RNFLT (10.8 µm vs. 3.58 µm, P < 0.001). However, the proportional errors were similar (4.3% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.47). In a multivariable regression model, errors in BMO-MRW were not significantly associated with age, location, magnitude, or severity of glaucoma loss (all P ≥ 0.05). However, larger RNFLT errors were associated with the superior and inferior sector location, thicker nerve fiber layer, and worse visual field (all P < 0.05). Errors in BMO-MRW and RNFLT were not likely to occur in the same sector location (R2 = 0.001; P = 0.15). With manual refinement, the glaucoma classification changed in 7.8% and 6.2% of eyes with BMO-MRW and RNFLT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both BMO-MRW and RNFLT measurements included segmentation errors, which did not seem to have a common location, and may result in differences in glaucoma classification. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Disco Óptico / Células Ganglionares de la Retina / Campos Visuales / Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto / Lámina Basal de la Coroides / Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica / Presión Intraocular / Fibras Nerviosas Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Disco Óptico / Células Ganglionares de la Retina / Campos Visuales / Glaucoma de Ángulo Abierto / Lámina Basal de la Coroides / Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica / Presión Intraocular / Fibras Nerviosas Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article