Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In silico analysis of rib force distribution in postscapulothoracic arthrodesis model.
Aslan, Lercan; Subasi, Omer; Gedik, Cemil Cihad; Birsel, Olgar; Lazoglu, Ismail; Demirhan, Mehmet; Eren, Ilker.
Afiliación
  • Aslan L; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Subasi O; Foot & Ankle Research and Innovation Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Gedik CC; Manufacturing and Automation Research Center, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Birsel O; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Lazoglu I; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Demirhan M; Manufacturing and Automation Research Center, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Eren I; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Orthop Res ; 42(5): 942-949, 2024 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38111178
ABSTRACT
Scapulothoracic arthrodesis (STA) is carried out by fixing the scapula to thoracic ribs which in turn allows the patient suffering from Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy to carry out shoulder-joint dependent activities of daily living. A biomechanical analysis of this procedure has not been conducted in the literature and, for the first time, this study investigates the finite element calculated glenohumeral-applied load distributions on ribs by creating a post-STA model. Three loading directions on the glenohumeral joint are designated anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and lateral-medial. Reaction forces on the ribs are calculated based on the glenoid force percent. Simulations are repeated by removing a singular rib contact to observe the change in force distributions in the case of missing levels or failed bonding as well as the impact of clavicle osteotomy. Total load distribution is observed highest at T2 followed by T3 and T6. In the T2 missing scenario, total loads on T3 and T4 increase. In the T4 missing case, the most affected level is T3. In the T6 missing scenario, total loads on T5 and T7 increase. In the clavicular osteotomy scenario, all levels' loads increase; the highest is recorded in T7 by 460%, followed by T5, T4, T2, T6, and T3. While all levels contribute to fixation strength, T2 is subjected to the highest loads, and, in the missing level scenarios, the loads are tolerated sufficiently by the remaining levels. Missing T4 scenario has the least effect on the system, which is interpreted as potentially the only skippable level of fixation. Clavicular osteotomy has the highest effect on the arthrodesis site.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación del Hombro / Distrofia Muscular Facioescapulohumeral Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación del Hombro / Distrofia Muscular Facioescapulohumeral Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía