Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Frailty is Correlated With Increased Adverse Events and Costs After Revision Knee Arthroplasty.
Kyaw, Nyi-Rein; Tram, Michael K; Lakra, Akshay; Bernasek, Thomas L; Lyons, Steven T; O'Connor, Casey M.
Afiliación
  • Kyaw NR; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
  • Tram MK; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
  • Lakra A; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
  • Bernasek TL; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
  • Lyons ST; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
  • O'Connor CM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York; Florida Orthopaedic Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; OrthoCarolina Matthews, Matthews, North Carolina.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(5): 1165-1170.e3, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38128625
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Frailty can predict adverse outcomes after various orthopaedic procedures, but is not well-studied in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). We investigated the correlation between the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and post-rTKA outcomes.

METHODS:

Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified rTKA patients discharged from January 2017 to November 2019 for the most common diagnoses (mechanical loosening, infection, and instability). Using HFRS, we compared 30-day readmission rate, length of stay, and hospitalization cost between frail and nonfrail patients with multivariate and binomial regressions. The 30-day complication and reoperation rates were compared using univariate analyses. We identified 25,177 mechanical loosening patients, 12,712 infection patients, and 9,458 instability patients.

RESULTS:

Frail patients had higher rates of 30-day readmission (7.8 versus 3.7% for loosening, 13.5 versus 8.1% for infection, 8.7 versus 3.9% for instability; P < .01), longer length of stay (4.1 versus 2.4 days for loosening, 8.1 versus 4.4 days for infection, 4.9 versus 2.4 days for instability; P < .01), and greater cost ($32,082 versus $27,582 for loosening, $32,898 versus $28,115 for infection, $29,790 versus $24,164 for instability; P < .01). Frail loosening patients had higher 30-day complication (6.8 versus 2.9%, P < .01) and reoperation rates (1.8 versus 1.2%, P = .01). Frail infection patients had higher 30-day complication rates (14.0 versus 8.3%, P < .01). Frail instability patients had higher 30-day complication (8.0 versus 3.5%, P < .01) and reoperation rates (3.2 versus 1.6%, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS:

The HFRS may identify patients at risk for adverse events and increased costs after rTKA. Further research is needed to determine causation and mitigate complications and costs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Fragilidad Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Fragilidad Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article