Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Addition of polygenic risk score to a risk calculator for prediction of breast cancer in US Black women.
Zirpoli, Gary R; Pfeiffer, Ruth M; Bertrand, Kimberly A; Huo, Dezheng; Lunetta, Kathryn L; Palmer, Julie R.
Afiliación
  • Zirpoli GR; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Pfeiffer RM; Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. pfeiffer@mail.nih.gov.
  • Bertrand KA; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA. pfeiffer@mail.nih.gov.
  • Huo D; Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Lunetta KL; Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Palmer JR; Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Breast Cancer Res ; 26(1): 2, 2024 01 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167144
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Previous work in European ancestry populations has shown that adding a polygenic risk score (PRS) to breast cancer risk prediction models based on epidemiologic factors results in better discriminatory performance as measured by the AUC (area under the curve). Following publication of the first PRS to perform well in women of African ancestry (AA-PRS), we conducted an external validation of the AA-PRS and then evaluated the addition of the AA-PRS to a risk calculator for incident breast cancer in Black women based on epidemiologic factors (BWHS model).

METHODS:

Data from the Black Women's Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of 59,000 US Black women followed by biennial questionnaire since 1995, were used to calculate AUCs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for discriminatory accuracy of the BWHS model, the AA-PRS alone, and a new model that combined them. Analyses were based on data from 922 women with invasive breast cancer and 1844 age-matched controls.

RESULTS:

AUCs were 0.577 (95% CI 0.556-0.598) for the BWHS model and 0.584 (95% CI 0.563-0.605) for the AA-PRS. For a model that combined estimates from the questionnaire-based BWHS model with the PRS, the AUC increased to 0.623 (95% CI 0.603-0.644).

CONCLUSIONS:

This combined model represents a step forward for personalized breast cancer preventive care for US Black women, as its performance metrics are similar to those from models in other populations. Use of this new model may mitigate exacerbation of breast cancer disparities if and when it becomes feasible to include a PRS in routine health care decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Puntuación de Riesgo Genético Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Breast Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Puntuación de Riesgo Genético Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Breast Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos