Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of socioeconomic status on enrollment in clinical trials for cancer: A systematic review.
Donzo, Maja Wichhart; Nguyen, Grace; Nemeth, John K; Owoc, Maryanna S; Mady, Leila J; Chen, Amy Y; Schmitt, Nicole C.
Afiliación
  • Donzo MW; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Nguyen G; The Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Nemeth JK; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Owoc MS; The Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Mady LJ; Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Chen AY; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Schmitt NC; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Cancer Med ; 13(1): e6905, 2024 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38169154
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To achieve equitable access to cancer clinical trials (CCTs), patients must overcome structural, clinical, and attitudinal barriers to trial enrollment. The goal of this systematic review was to study the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES), assessed either by direct or proxy measures, and CCT enrollment.

METHODS:

The review team and medical librarian developed search strategies for each database to identify studies for this systematic review, which was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were as follows studies published in relevant scientific journals between January 2000 and July 2022, primary sources, English literature, and studies conducted in the US. Sixteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The risk of bias assessment was conducted independently by two reviewers using the Newcastle Ottawa scale.

RESULTS:

The initial search yielded 4070 citations, and 16 studies were included in our review. Four of the studies included used patient reported annual income as a measure of SES, while the remaining 12 studies used patient zip code as a proxy measurement of SES. Consistent with our hypothesis, 13 studies showed a positive association between high SES (patient-reported or proxy measurement) and CCT enrollment. Two studies showed a negative association, and one study showed no relationship.

CONCLUSIONS:

The existing literature suggests that low SES is associated with lower participation in CCT. The small number of studies identified on this topic highlights the need for additional research on SES and other barriers to CCT participation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clase Social / Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Selección de Paciente / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clase Social / Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Selección de Paciente / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos