Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Migliorini, Filippo; Maffulli, Nicola; Schäfer, Luise; Simeone, Francesco; Bell, Andreas; Hofmann, Ulf Krister.
Afiliación
  • Migliorini F; Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Medical Centre, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. migliorini.md@gmail.com.
  • Maffulli N; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 39100, Bolzano, Italy. migliorini.md@gmail.com.
  • Schäfer L; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University la Sapienza, 00185, Rome, Italy.
  • Simeone F; School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University Faculty of Medicine, Stoke On Trent, ST4 7QB, UK.
  • Bell A; Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4DG, UK.
  • Hofmann UK; Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Medical Centre, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Knee Surg Relat Res ; 36(1): 3, 2024 Jan 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212863
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The present systematic review investigated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) of several frequent and established PROMs used to assess patients who have undergone TKA. This study was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement.

METHODS:

In September 2023, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were accessed with no time constraint All clinical studies investigating tools to assess the clinical relevance of PROMs used to evaluate patients having received TKA were accessed. Only studies which evaluated the MCID, PASS, or SCB were eligible. The PROMs of interest were the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and its related subscales activity of daily living (ADL), pain, quality of life (QoL), sports and recreational activities, and symptoms, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score, the Knee Society Score (KSS) and related function score, and the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and Short Form-36 (SF-36).

RESULTS:

Data from 29,737 patients were collected. The overall risk of bias was low to moderate. The great variability of thresholds for MCID, SCB and PASS between questionnaires but also between investigated aspects was noted, whereby MCIDs for the SF-36 appear lower than for knee-specific questionnaires.

CONCLUSION:

Despite its critical role from a patient's perspective, the dimension of SCB is still neglected in the literature. Moreover, thresholds for the different concepts need to be condition-specific. We encourage authors to specifically report such data in future studies and to adhere to previously reported definitions to allow future comparison. Level of evidence Level IV, systematic review and meta-analysis.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Knee Surg Relat Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Knee Surg Relat Res Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania