Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer: A scoping narrative literature review with a focus on the introduction of evidence-based therapeutic approaches in Europe.
Corral, Julieta; Borras, Josep M; Lievens, Yolande.
Afiliación
  • Corral J; Catalonian Cancer Plan, Department of Health, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Borras JM; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Lievens Y; Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ; 45: 100717, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38226026
ABSTRACT
Background and

purpose:

The aim of this study was to review the published studies on the utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer (both small and non-small cell lung cancer, SCLC and NSCLC) patients in European countries with a population-based perspective. Material and

methods:

A literature search since January 2000 until December 2022 was carried out. Only English-published papers were included, and only European data was considered. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A scoping narrative review was undertaken due to the hetereogeneity of the published papers.

Results:

38 papers were included in the analysis, with the majority from the Netherlands (52.6%) and the UK (18.4%). Large variability is observed in the reported radiotherapy utilisation, around 40% for NSCLC in general and between 26 and 42% in stage I NSCLC. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) shows a wide range of utilisation across countries and over time, from 8 to 63%. Similary, in stage III lung cancer, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) utilisation varied considerably (11-70%). Eleven studies compared radiotherapy utilisation between older and younger age-groups, showing that younger patients receive more CRT, while the opposite applies for SBRT. An widespreadlack of data on relevant covariates such as comorbidty and health-services related variables is observed.

Conclusion:

The actual utilisation of radiotherapy for lung cancer reported in patterns-of-care studies (POCs) is notably lower than the evidence-based optimal utilisation. Important variability is observed by country, time period, stage at diagnosis and age. A wider use of POCs should be promoted to improve our knowledge on the actual application of evidence-based treatment recommendations.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: Irlanda