Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of long COVID.
Klírová, Monika; Adamová, Andrea; Biacková, Nina; Laskov, Olga; Renková, Veronika; Stuchlíková, Zuzana; Odnohová, Karolína; Novák, Tomás.
Afiliación
  • Klírová M; National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic. klirovamonika@gmail.com.
  • Adamová A; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. klirovamonika@gmail.com.
  • Biacková N; National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
  • Laskov O; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Renková V; National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
  • Stuchlíková Z; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Odnohová K; National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67, Klecany, Czech Republic.
  • Novák T; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 2193, 2024 01 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272997
ABSTRACT
The study aimed to assess the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of neuropsychiatric (NP) symptoms of the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), known as the long COVID. A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of prefrontal cortex active tDCS to sham-tDCS in treating NP-PASC. Patients diagnosed with NP-PASC, with a Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) score ≥ 40, were eligible for the study. Twenty tDCS sessions were administered within four weeks, with continuous, end-of-treatment, and follow-up measurements. The primary outcome was a change in the FIS at the end-of-treatment, analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Data from 33 patients assigned to active (n = 16) or sham-tDCS (n = 17) were analyzed. After the treatment, a decrease in the FIS score was more pronounced in the sham than in the active group, yet the intergroup difference was insignificant (11.7 [95% CI -11.1 to 34.5], p = 0.6). Furthermore, no significant intergroup differences were observed regarding anxiety, depression, quality of life, and cognitive performance. The small cohort sample, differences in baseline FIS scores between groups (non-stratified randomization), or chosen stimulation parameters may have influenced our findings. However, it might also be possible that the expected mechanism of action of tDCS is insufficient to treat these conditions.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: República Checa Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa / COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: República Checa Pais de publicación: Reino Unido