Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Information needs during cancer care: Qualitative research with locally advanced cervical cancer patients in Brazil, China, Germany, & the US.
Szamreta, Elizabeth A; Mulvihill, Emily; Aguinaga, Katherine; Amos, Kaitlan; Zannit, Heather; Salani, Ritu.
Afiliación
  • Szamreta EA; Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co. Inc, 126 E. Lincoln Ave, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA.
  • Mulvihill E; Oracle Life Sciences, 2800 Rock Creek Pkwy, North Kansas City, MO 64117, USA.
  • Aguinaga K; Oracle Life Sciences, 2800 Rock Creek Pkwy, North Kansas City, MO 64117, USA.
  • Amos K; Oracle Life Sciences, 2800 Rock Creek Pkwy, North Kansas City, MO 64117, USA.
  • Zannit H; Oracle Life Sciences, 2800 Rock Creek Pkwy, North Kansas City, MO 64117, USA.
  • Salani R; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 51: 101321, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38273935
ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study aimed to identify the information needs and factors for making informed treatment decisions among a diverse group of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with LACC patients of diverse demographic and socioeconomic backgrounds within two years of their cancer diagnosis. Trained moderators asked open-ended questions about patients' cancer journeys. Transcripts were analyzed using NVivo software to identify emergent themes.

Results:

In 2022, 92 LACC patients in the United States (n = 26), Brazil (n = 25), China (n = 25), and Germany (n = 16) participated in the study. Physicians were valued sources of information, providing patients with details on prognosis, treatment options, and side effects. While most patients trusted their physicians, one-third sought a second opinion to validate their diagnosis or find a more trusted physician.Most patients conducted their own research on treatment options, side effects, causes of LACC, symptoms, and others' experiences. Challenges to information searches included understanding medical terms, finding relevant information, and evaluating source credibility.Overall, patients felt knowledgeable enough to participate in treatment decisions, either by accepting the recommended treatment or collaborating with their physicians. Nearly one-third of patients desired a more significant role in the decision-making process.

Conclusion:

This study highlights the importance of physicians providing LACC patients comprehensive and understandable information, while involving them in the decision-making process. Understanding LACC patients' motivations to seek information and their willingness to actively engage in treatment decisions can lead to improved patient satisfaction in their cancer care.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos