Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Alveolar ridge preservation of two-wall bone defects using mineralized dentin matrix: An experimental pre-clinical study.
Yan, Zi-Yu; Wang, Fei; Han, Jian-Min; Wu, Bin-Zhang; Guo, Chuan-Bin; Cui, Nian-Hui.
Afiliación
  • Yan ZY; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Wang F; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Han JM; National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Department of Dental Materials, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Wu BZ; First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Guo CB; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
  • Cui NH; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 35(4): 407-418, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38287504
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To study bone healing of two-wall bone defects after alveolar ridge preservation using mineralized dentin matrix. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

After distal roots extraction of second and fourth premolars (P2, P4) on one lateral mandible in 12 beagles, two-wall bone defects (5 × 5 × 5 mm) were surgically created distally to the remaining mesial roots of P2 and P4. A total of 24 sites were randomly allocated to three groups (implant material- time of execution) mineralized dentin matrix (MDM)-3 m (MDM + collagen membrane; 3 months), MDM-6 m (MDM particles + collagen membrane; 6 months), and C-6 m (collagen membrane only; 6 months). Clinical, radiographic, digital, and histological examinations were performed 3 and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS:

The bone healing in MDM groups were better compared to Control group (volume of bone regenerated in total 25.12 mm3 vs. 13.30 mm3, p = .046; trabecular volume/total volume 58.84% vs. 39.18%, p = .001; new bone formation rate 44.13% vs. 31.88%, p = .047). Vertically, the radiological bone level of bone defect in MDM-6 m group was higher than that in C-6 m group (vertical height of bone defect 1.55 mm vs. 2.74 mm, p = .018). Horizontally, no significant differences in buccolingual bone width were found between MDM and C groups at any time or at any level below the alveolar ridge. The percentages of remaining MDM were <1% in both MDM-3 m and MDM-6 m groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

MDM improved bone healing of two-wall bone defects and might be considered as a socket fill material used following tooth extraction.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar / Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar / Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China