Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The MCID of the PROMIS physical function instrument for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures.
Thorne, Tyler J; Cizik, Amy M; Kellam, Patrick J; Rothberg, David L; Higgins, Thomas F; Dekeyser, Graham J; Haller, Justin M.
Afiliación
  • Thorne TJ; University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Cizik AM; University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Kellam PJ; University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Rothberg DL; University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Higgins TF; University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
  • Dekeyser GJ; University of Washington, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Haller JM; University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address: justin.haller@hsc.utah.edu.
Injury ; 55(4): 111375, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290908
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Understanding minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient reported outcome measurement are important in improving patient care. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) domain for patients who underwent operative fixation of a tibial plateau fracture.

METHODS:

All patients with tibial plateau fractures that underwent operative fixation at a single level 1 trauma center were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients without PROMIS PF scores or an anchor question at two-time points postoperatively were excluded. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were calculated.

RESULTS:

The MCID for PROMIS PF scores was 4.85 in the distribution-based method and 3.93 (SD 14.01) in the anchor-based method. There was significantly more improvement in the score from the first postoperative score (<7 weeks) to the second postoperative time (<78 weeks) in the improvement group 10.95 (SD 9.95) compared to the no improvement group 7.02 (SD 9.87) in the anchor-based method (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving MCID at 7 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year were 37-42 %, 57-62 %, 80-84 %, and 95-87 %, respectively.

DISCUSSION:

This study identified MCID values for PROMIS PF scores in the tibial plateau fracture population. Both MCID scores were similar, resulting in a reliable value for future studies and clinical decision-making. An MCID of 3.93 to 4.85 can be used as a clinical and investigative standard for patients with operative tibial plateau fractures.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas de la Tibia / Fracturas de la Meseta Tibial Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Injury Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas de la Tibia / Fracturas de la Meseta Tibial Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Injury Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos