Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The optimal timing of frozen-thawed embryo transfer: delayed or not delayed? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gao, Yu-Qi; Song, Jing-Yan; Sun, Zhen-Gao.
Afiliación
  • Gao YQ; The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Song JY; The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Sun ZG; Reproductive and Genetic Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1335139, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38293305

Background:

The use of frozen embryo transfer (FET) has grown exponentially over the past few years. However, in clinical practice, there are no specific criteria as to whether a delay of at least one menstrual cycle is required for an FET after a failed fresh ET or a freeze-all cycle.

Objective:

Through the effects on live birth rate (LBR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and pregnancy loss rate (PLR), to determine whether FET requires a delay of at least one menstrual cycle after fresh ET failure or a freeze-all cycle.

Methods:

The search was conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for terms related to FET timing as of April 2023. There are no restrictions on the year of publication or follow-up time. Women aged 20 to 46 with any indication for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment are eligible for inclusion. Oocyte donation studies are excluded. Except for the case report, study protocol, and abstract, all original studies are included.

Results:

In 4,124 search results, 19 studies were included in the review. The meta-analysis includes studies on the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of reported live birth rate (LBR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and pregnancy loss rate (PLR), 17 studies were retrospective cohort study, and 2 studies were randomized controlled trial, a total of 6,917 immediate FET cycles and 16,105 delayed FET cycles were involved. In this meta-analysis, the combined OR of LBR was [OR = 1.09, 95% CI (0.93­1.28)], the combined OR of CPR was [OR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.92­1.20)], and the combined OR of PLR was (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.75­1.22). There was no statistical significance between the two groups.

Conclusion:

Overall, delaying FET by at least one menstrual cycle has no advantage in LBR, CPR, or PLR. So, flexible scheduling of FETs is available to both doctors and patients. Systematic review registration https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42020161648.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China