Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Therapeutic validity and replicability of power training interventions in older adults: A review using the TIDieR checklist and CONTENT scale.
El Hadouchi, Mohamed; Kiers, Henri; Boerstra, Brittany A; Veenhof, Cindy; van Dieën, Jaap.
Afiliación
  • El Hadouchi M; Institute for Human Movement Studies, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584, CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Kiers H; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Boerstra BA; HRC, Sports & Science Health, Hoeflingweg 20, 7241, CH, Lochem, the Netherlands.
  • Veenhof C; Research Group Innovation of Movement Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584, CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • van Dieën J; Institute for Human Movement Studies, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584, CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Heliyon ; 10(2): e24362, 2024 Jan 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38298697
ABSTRACT

Background:

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that power training has the ability to improve muscle power and physical performance in older adults. However, power training definitions are broad and previously-established criteria are vague, making the validity and replicability of power training interventions used in RCTs uncertain.

Objective:

The aim of this review was to assess whether the power training interventions identified in a previous systematic review (el Hadouchi 2022) are fully described, therapeutically valid, and meet our proposed criteria for power training.

Design:

Review.

Methods:

Power training interventions used in older adults, previously-identified in a systematic review, were assessed. The completeness of intervention descriptions was evaluated using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR), and therapeutic validity was evaluated using the CONTENT scale in combination with a set of criteria specific for power training.

Results:

None of the power training interventions were fully described or met the CONTENT scale's criteria for therapeutic validity. Five out of 14 interventions (35.7 %) met all specific power training criteria.

Conclusions:

Power training interventions used in RCTs comparing power training to strength training are poor to moderately described, may not be therapeutically valid, and may not reflect the construct of power training. This makes it difficult for clinicians or researchers to apply or replicate power training interventions reported in RCTs, and begs the question whether the true effects of power training have been estimated.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Heliyon Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido