Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identifying Strategies for the Use of Gender and Sex Language in Clinical One-Liners.
Zussman, Jay W; Ma, Jessica Y; Bindman, Jay G; Cornes, Susannah; Davis, John A; Brondfield, Sam.
Afiliación
  • Zussman JW; School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Ma JY; School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Bindman JG; School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Cornes S; School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Davis JA; Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Brondfield S; School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
LGBT Health ; 11(6): 484-494, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301142
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The "one-liner," commonly used in clinical communications, summarizes a patient's identity, presenting condition, medical history, and clinical findings. Imprecise, inconsistent use of gender and sex information in one-liners threatens the provision of affirming care to transgender, nonbinary, gender-expansive, and intersex patients and may exacerbate health care disparities. This study aimed to generate guidance for communicating gender and sex information in one-liners.

Methods:

This is an explanatory sequential, equal status mixed methods study of transgender, nonbinary, gender-expansive, and intersex people and clinicians caring for this population. Survey participants rated one-liners on a five-point Likert-type scale of appropriateness, considering affirmation and clinical utility, and provided open-ended comments. We conducted two focus groups with survey respondents to explore survey results and performed a thematic analysis of survey comments and focus group transcripts.

Results:

Survey respondents included 57 clinicians and 80 nonclinicians. One-liners containing patient pronouns were rated most appropriate, and appropriate patient descriptors included self-described gender identity or gender-neutral terms. In scenarios where patient sex information was not pertinent to the chief concern (CC), one-liners containing no sex information were rated most appropriate. Four themes were identified inclusion of sex information based on relevance to the CC, accurate patient representation, influence of clinical setting, and risk of harm from inaccurate one-liners.

Conclusion:

This study generated data to support the appropriate use of gender and sex language in one-liners. Clinicians, educators, and trainees may use these findings to compose one-liners that are affirming and clinically useful for patients of diverse gender and sex identities.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupos Focales / Identidad de Género Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: LGBT Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupos Focales / Identidad de Género Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: LGBT Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos