Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance and validation of two ICU delirium assessment and severity tools; a prospective observational study.
den Boogaard, Mark van; Leenders, Margot; Pop-Purceleanu, Monica; Tilburgs, Bram.
Afiliación
  • den Boogaard MV; Radboud University Medical Center, Department Intensive Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Mark.vandenBoogaard@Radboudumc.nl.
  • Leenders M; Radboud University Medical Center, Department Intensive Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Pop-Purceleanu M; Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatrie, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Tilburgs B; Radboud University Medical Center, Department Intensive Care, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 83: 103627, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301387
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The clinical statistical performance of the Confusion Assessment Method Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU, including CAM-ICU-7) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) have rarely been studied. Additionally, delirium severity is often not measured due to a lack of validation of delirium assessment tools.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim was to determine the statistical performance of both delirium assessment tools in daily practice, and the correlation with the gold standard Delirium Rating Scale (DRS)-R98, for delirium severity. RESEARCH

METHOD:

CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC, performed by nurses were compared with the DRS-R98 assessed by delirium experts, twice weekly. Within a time-window of one hour all assessments were independently performed.

DESIGN:

A prospective observational study performed between October and December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of both tools was determined. The correlation between DRS-R98 and CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC was used for validation of delirium severity.

RESULTS:

In total, 104 CAM-ICU-7 and 105 ICDSC assessments in 86 patients were compared with the DRS-R98. For the CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC, respectively, the sensitivity was 90% and 95%, the specificity was 92.4% and 92.3%. The positive predictive value was 0.76 and 0.80, and negative predictive value was 0.77 and 0.97. Correlation of the CAM-ICU-7 score and ICDSC score with the DRS-R98 score was 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.81) and 0.70 (95%CI 0.59-0.79; both p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Both CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC demonstrated good statistical performance and correlated well with the delirium severity tool DRS-R98. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE Nurses can either use the CAM-ICU(-7) or the ICDSC in their practice, both are accurate in delirium diagnosis. Total CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC score reflects delirium severity well; the higher the score, the more severe the delirium. This enables nurses to gauge the impact of their interventions and enhance the well-being of patients experiencing delirium by minimizing distressing occurrences.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Delirio / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Intensive Crit Care Nurs Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Delirio / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Intensive Crit Care Nurs Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos