Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Farm-level nutritional factors associated with milk production and milking behavior on Canadian farms with automated milking systems.
Van Soest, B J; Matson, R D; Santschi, D E; Duffield, T F; Steele, M A; Orsel, K; Pajor, E A; Penner, G B; Mutsvangwa, T; DeVries, T J.
Afiliación
  • Van Soest BJ; Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.
  • Matson RD; Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.
  • Santschi DE; Lactanet, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X3R4, Canada.
  • Duffield TF; Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G1Y2, Canada.
  • Steele MA; Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada.
  • Orsel K; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4Z6, Canada.
  • Pajor EA; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N4Z6, Canada.
  • Penner GB; Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N5A8, Canada.
  • Mutsvangwa T; Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N5A8, Canada.
  • DeVries TJ; Department of Animal Bioscience, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada. Electronic address: tdevries@uoguelph.ca.
J Dairy Sci ; 107(7): 4409-4425, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38310965
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to describe the nutritional strategies used on Canadian dairy farms with automated milking systems (AMS), both at the feed bunk and the concentrate offered at the AMS, as well as to determine what dietary components and nutrients, as formulated, were associated with milk production and milking behaviors on those farms. Formulated diets (including ingredients and nutrient content) and AMS data were collected from April 1, 2019, until September 30, 2020, on 160 AMS farms (eastern Canada [East] = 8, Ontario [ON] = 76, Quebec [QC] = 22, and western Canada [West] = 54). Both partial mixed ration (PMR) and AMS concentrate samples were collected from May 1 to September 30, 2019, on 169 farms (East = 12, ON = 63, QC = 42, West = 52). We collected AMS milking data for 154 herds. For each farm (n = 161), milk recording data were collected and summarized by farm to calculate average milk yield and components. Multivariable regression models were used to associate herd-level formulated nutrient composition and feeding management practices with milk production and milking behavior. Milk yield (mean ± SD = 37.0 ± 0.3 kg/d) was positively associated with the PMR ether extract (EE) concentration (+0.97 kg/d per percentage point [p.p.] increase) and with farms that fed barley silage as their major forage source (n = 16; +2.18 kg/d) as compared with haylage (n = 42), whereas farms that fed corn silage (n = 96; +1.23 kg/d) tended to produce more milk than farms that fed haylage. Greater milk fat content (4.09 ± 0.28%) was associated with a greater PMR-to-AMS concentrate ratio (+0.02 p.p. per unit increase) and total diet net energy for lactation (+0.046 p.p. per 0.1 Mcal/kg increase), but a lesser percentage of NFC of the PMR (-0.016 p.p. per p.p. increase of NFC percentage). Milk protein content (3.38 ± 0.14%) was positively associated with the forage percentage of the PMR (+0.003 p.p. per p.p. increase of forage percentage) and the total diet starch percentage (+0.009 p.p. per p.p. increase of starch percentage), but was negatively associated with farms feeding corn silage (-0.1 p.p. compared with haylage) as their major forage. Greater milking frequency (2.77 ± 0.40 milkings/d) was observed on farms with free-flow cow traffic systems (+0.62 milkings/d) and was positively associated with feed push-up frequency (+0.013 milkings/d per additional feed push-up), but negatively associated with PMR NFC content and forage percentage of the total ration (-0.017 milkings/d per p.p. increase of forage percentage). Lastly, greater milking refusal frequency (1.49 ± 0.82 refusals/d) was observed on farms with free-flow cow traffic systems (+0.84 refusals/d) and farms feeding barley silage (+0.58 refusals/d) than with guided flow and farms feeding either corn silage or haylage, respectively. These data give insight into the ingredients, nutrient formulations and type of diets fed on AMS dairy farms across Canada and the association of those factors with milk production and milking behaviors.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lactancia / Industria Lechera / Leche / Dieta Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lactancia / Industria Lechera / Leche / Dieta Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá