Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Discussions with patients about referral pathways and costs in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in Victoria, Australia.
Bergin, Rebecca J; Yao-Dong Yu, Angus; White, Victoria; Emery, Jon.
Afiliación
  • Bergin RJ; BA@Sc (Hons), PhD, Research Fellow, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Vic; Department of General Practice/Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic.
  • Yao-Dong Yu A; BBmed (Hons), Research Fellow, Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Vic; Sydney Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
  • White V; BA (Hons), MA, PhD, Professor of Psychology (Psycho-Oncology), School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Vic; Research Fellow, Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Vic.
  • Emery J; MA, MBBCh, FRACGP, MRCGP, DPhil, Herman Professor of Primary Care Cancer Research, Department of General Practice and Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 53(1-2): 70-77, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316485
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) survival in Australia differs by health insurance status, but why this occurs is uncertain. There are growing concerns about out-of-pocket healthcare costs. We examined patient experiences of referral pathways to diagnosis and treatment of CRC in Victoria, Australia, and discussions about costs, comparing public, private and mixed healthcare system users.

METHOD:

Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 16 purposively sampled, English-speaking patients aged ≥40 years with CRC. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

RESULTS:

Private patients described greater out-of-pocket expenses balanced by greater choice of provider and access. Public patients perceived limited choice in their diagnostic or treatment provider, although some considered switching systems. Patients trusted their general practitioner or specialist for referrals. Discussions about costs did not meet guideline recommendations.

DISCUSSION:

There are limited opportunities for informed decision making about public versus private care for cancer diagnosis and treatment, which could contribute to inequalities in outcomes.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Atención a la Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust J Gen Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Atención a la Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust J Gen Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article