Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers.
Campoamor, Nicola B; Guerrini, Christi J; Brooks, Whitney Bash; Bridges, John F P; Crossnohere, Norah L.
Afiliación
  • Campoamor NB; Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Guerrini CJ; Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Brooks WB; Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Bridges JFP; Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Crossnohere NL; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. Norah.crossnohere@osumc.edu.
Patient ; 17(2): 109-120, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38363501
ABSTRACT
Discrete-choice experiments (DCEs) are a frequently used method to explore the preferences of patients and other decision-makers in health. Pretesting is an essential stage in the design of a high-quality choice experiment and involves engaging with representatives of the target population to improve the readability, presentation, and structure of the preference instrument. The goal of pretesting in DCEs is to improve the validity, reliability, and relevance of the survey, while decreasing sources of bias, burden, and error associated with preference elicitation, data collection, and interpretation of the data. Despite its value to inform DCE design, pretesting lacks documented good practices or clearly reported applied examples. The purpose of this paper is (1) to define pretesting and describe the pretesting process specifically in the context of a DCE, (2) to present a practical guide and pretesting interview discussion template for researchers looking to conduct a rigorous pretest of a DCE, and (3) to provide an illustrative example of how these resources were operationalized to inform the design of a complex DCE aimed at eliciting tradeoffs between personal privacy and societal benefit in the context of a police method known as investigative genetic genealogy (IGG).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta de Elección / Prioridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Patient Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta de Elección / Prioridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Patient Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos