Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The good, the bad and the ugly of transposable elements annotation tools.
Loreto, Elgion L S; Melo, Elverson S de; Wallau, Gabriel L; Gomes, Tiago M F F.
Afiliación
  • Loreto ELS; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Melo ES; Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Wallau GL; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães, Departamento de Entomologia, Recife, PE, Brazil.
  • Gomes TMFF; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães, Departamento de Entomologia, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Genet Mol Biol ; 46(3 Suppl 1): e20230138, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38373163
ABSTRACT
Transposable elements are repetitive and mobile DNA segments that can be found in virtually all organisms investigated to date. Their complex structure and variable nature are particularly challenging from the genomic annotation point of view. Many softwares have been developed to automate and facilitate TEs annotation at the genomic level, but they are highly heterogeneous regarding documentation, usability and methods. In this review, we revisited the existing software for TE genomic annotation, concentrating on the most often used ones, the methodologies they apply, and usability. Building on the state of the art of TE annotation software we propose best practices and highlight the strengths and weaknesses from the available solutions.