Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advancing screening tool for hospice needs and end-of-life decision-making process in the emergency department.
Wang, Yu-Jing; Hsu, Chen-Yang; Yen, Amy Ming-Fang; Chen, Hsiu-Hsi; Lai, Chao-Chih.
Afiliación
  • Wang YJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan. No. 10, Sec. 4, Ren-Ai Road, Ren-Ai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Hsu CY; Master of Public Health Program, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Yen AM; Master of Public Health Program, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen HH; Medical Department, Daichung Hospital, Miaoli, Taiwan.
  • Lai CC; Taiwan Association of Medical Screening, Taipei, Taiwan.
BMC Palliat Care ; 23(1): 51, 2024 Feb 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38389106
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Predicting mortality in the emergency department (ED) is imperative to guide palliative care and end-of-life decisions. However, the clinical usefulness of utilizing the existing screening tools still leaves something to be desired.

METHODS:

We advanced the screening tool with the A-qCPR (Age, qSOFA (quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment), cancer, Performance Status Scale, and DNR (Do-Not-Resuscitate) risk score model for predicting one-year mortality in the emergency department of Taipei City Hospital of Taiwan with the potential of hospice need and evaluated its performance compared with the existing screening model. We adopted a large retrospective cohort in conjunction with in-time (the trained and the holdout validation cohort) for the development of the A-qCPR model and out-of-time validation sample for external validation and model robustness to variation with the calendar year.

RESULTS:

A total of 10,474 patients were enrolled in the training cohort and 33,182 patients for external validation. Significant risk scores included age (0.05 per year), qSOFA ≥ 2 (4), Cancer (5), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score ≥ 2 (2), and DNR status (2). One-year mortality rates were 13.6% for low (score ≦ 3 points), 29.9% for medium (3 < Score ≦ 9 points), and 47.1% for high categories (Score > 9 points). The AUROC curve for the in-time validation sample was 0.76 (0.74-0.78). However, the corresponding figure was slightly shrunk to 0.69 (0.69-0.70) based on out-of-time validation. The accuracy with our newly developed A-qCPR model was better than those existing tools including 0.57 (0.56-0.57) by using SQ (surprise question), 0.54 (0.54-0.54) by using qSOFA, and 0.59 (0.59-0.59) by using ECOG performance status score. Applying the A-qCPR model to emergency departments since 2017 has led to a year-on-year increase in the proportion of patients or their families signing DNR documents, which had not been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS:

The A-qCPR model is not only effective in predicting one-year mortality but also in identifying hospice needs. Advancing the screening tool that has been widely used for hospice in various scenarios is particularly helpful for facilitating the end-of-life decision-making process in the ED.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales / Neoplasias Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Palliat Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales / Neoplasias Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Palliat Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Reino Unido