Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The EASEMENT study: A multicentre, observational, cross-sectional study to evaluate patient preferences, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, and healthcare resource use in patients with multiple myeloma receiving injectable-containing or fully oral therapies.
Ayto, Robert; Annibali, Ombretta; Biedermann, Patricia; Roset, Montserrat; Sánchez, Emilio; Kotb, Rami.
Afiliación
  • Ayto R; Department of Haematology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
  • Annibali O; Hematology, Stem Cell Transplantation, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
  • Biedermann P; Medical Affairs, Europe & Canada, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Roset M; Real World Solutions, IQVIA, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Sánchez E; Real World Solutions, IQVIA, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Kotb R; Medical Oncology & Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Eur J Haematol ; 112(6): 889-899, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38389468
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

As multiple myeloma (MM) therapies advance, understanding patients', caregivers', and physicians' perspectives on, and satisfaction with, available treatment options and their impact on quality of life (QoL), is important.

METHODS:

EASEMENT is a real-world, observational, cross-sectional study conducted in 19 sites within the UK, Canada, and Italy using retrospective chart reviews and surveys. Enrolled patients had clinical history available since diagnosis and had received ≥1 cycle of their current line of therapy. Primary objectives were to describe patient/caregiver QoL (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire), patient preference for oral/injectable therapies (single discrete-choice question), and patient satisfaction (TSQM-9 questionnaire).

RESULTS:

Between October 2018 and March 2020, 399 patients were enrolled (n = 192 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma [NDMM], n = 206 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma [RRMM], n = 1 missing). Among NDMM and RRMM patients, 78%/22% and 42%/58% were receiving injectables/orals, respectively. Both NDMM and RRMM patients significantly preferred orals versus injectables (p < .0001). No significant differences were reported in treatment satisfaction or QoL, but treatment convenience favoured orals over injectables with near significance (p = .053).

CONCLUSION:

MM patients perceived greater convenience and preference for orals versus injectables. Oral treatments are useful for patients who cannot or prefer not to travel to clinics, or cannot perform self-injection within the community.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Satisfacción del Paciente / Prioridad del Paciente / Mieloma Múltiple Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Haematol Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Satisfacción del Paciente / Prioridad del Paciente / Mieloma Múltiple Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Haematol Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido