Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Retrospective Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Refractory to Gemcitabine Monotherapy.
Nishioka, Mariko; Okano, Naohiro; Wakabayashi, Masashi; Ikeno, Takashi; Hayashi, Masato; Mizutani, Tomonori; Nagashima, Fumio; Furuse, Junji.
Afiliación
  • Nishioka M; Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Okano N; Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; naohiro-okano@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp.
  • Wakabayashi M; Biostatistics Division, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ikeno T; Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Hayashi M; Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Mizutani T; Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nagashima F; Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Furuse J; Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Anticancer Res ; 44(3): 1233-1239, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423651
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

AIM:

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX), termed GnP, which is limited, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) who show good tolerance to GEM monotherapy prior to being refractory to it. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with locally advanced or metastatic PC who received GEM followed by GnP between December 2014 and March 2019, regardless of the treatment line.

RESULTS:

A total of 14 patients who received GnP after becoming refractory to GEM were included in this study. Eight patients were included in the nab-PTX-naïve group, seven of whom were treated with GEM monotherapy as first-line chemotherapy, and one was refractory to GEM monotherapy after modified FOLFIRINOX treatment. The other six patients were included in the nab-PTX reintroduction group. In this group, all patients received GnP followed by GEM maintenance therapy to prevent adverse events, such as peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. Two patients in the nab-PTX-naïve group showed partial response and none in the reintroduction group; median progression-free survival was 7.6 and 1.4 months and median overall survival was 9.4 and 6.2 months, respectively. In the safety analysis, grade 3 anemia and peripheral neuropathy were observed in one patient in the nab-PTX reintroduction group, while the remaining adverse events were of grade 1 or 2.

CONCLUSION:

GnP is safe and effective even in patients with GEM-refractory PC, and GEM treatment followed by GnP can be an effective treatment option for patients with nab-PTX-naïve PC.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Anticancer Res / Anticancer res / Anticancer research Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Grecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Anticancer Res / Anticancer res / Anticancer research Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Grecia