Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mitral valve replacement in children: balancing durability and risk with mechanical and bioprosthetic valves.
Van Puyvelde, Joeri; Meyns, Bart; Rega, Filip; Gewillig, Marc; Eyskens, Benedicte; Heying, Ruth; Cools, Bjorn; Salaets, Thomas; Hellings, Peter-William; Meuris, Bart.
Afiliación
  • Van Puyvelde J; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Meyns B; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Rega F; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Gewillig M; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Eyskens B; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Heying R; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Cools B; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Salaets T; Department of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Hellings PW; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Meuris B; Department of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447197
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate if there is still a place for bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in children by comparing the prosthetic durability and transplant-free survival after bioprosthetic and mechanical mitral valve replacement.

METHODS:

We reviewed all mitral valve replacements in children between 1981 and 2020. Bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement cases were individually matched to mechanical mitral valve replacement cases. The incidence rate of a 2nd replacement was calculated using the cumulative incidence function that considered death or transplantation as a competing risk.

RESULTS:

The median age at implantation was 3.6 years (interquartile range 0.8-7.9) for the bioprosthetic valve cohort (n = 28) and 3 years (interquartile range 1.3-7.8) for the mechanical valve cohort (n = 28). Seven years after bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement, the cumulative incidence of death or transplantation was 17.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3-34.1] and the cumulative incidence of a 2nd replacement was 63.6% (95% CI 39.9-80.1). Seven years after mechanical mitral valve replacement, the cumulative incidence of death or transplantation was 28.6% (95% CI 13.3-46) and the cumulative incidence of a 2nd replacement was 10.7% (95% CI 2.6-25.5). Fifteen years after mechanical mitral valve replacement, the cumulative incidence of death or transplantation was 33.6% (95% CI 16.2-52.1) and the cumulative incidence of a 2nd replacement was 41.1% (95% CI 18.4-62.7). The cumulative incidence curves for bioprosthetic and mechanical mitral valve replacement were statistically different for a 2nd valve replacement (P < 0.001) but not for death or transplantation (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS:

There is no difference in transplant-free survival after bioprosthetic and mechanical mitral valve replacement in children. The lifespan of bioprosthetic mitral valves remains limited in children because of structural valve failure due to calcification. After 15 years, 40% of mechanical valves were replaced, primarily because of patient-prosthesis mismatch related to somatic growth.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica Pais de publicación: Reino Unido