Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of gadolinium-based intravenous contrast in the initial characterization of musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors.
Wehrend, Jonathan; Gimarc, David; Ashwell, Zachary R; Jensen, Alexandria; Major, Nancy; Ho, Corey K.
Afiliación
  • Wehrend J; University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Radiology, 12605 E 16th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • Gimarc D; University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Radiology, 12605 E 16th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • Ashwell ZR; University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Radiology, 12605 E 16th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • Jensen A; University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Radiology, 12605 E 16th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • Major N; University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Radiology, 12605 E 16th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • Ho CK; University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Radiology, 12605 E 16th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Electronic address: Corey.K.Ho@CUAnschutz.edu.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 53(4): 470-476, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480060
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine if gadolinium-based contrast agents increase the sensitivity, specificity or reader confidence of malignant potential in musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors.

METHODS:

Pre- and post-contrast MRI studies from 87 patients were read by three independent radiologists of different experience. Readers noted malignant potential and confidence in their diagnosis based on pre-contrast and post-contrast MRI studies. Statistical models assessed for agreement between MRI reader diagnosis and pathologic results as well as analyzing effects of contrast on reader confidence. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities of malignant potential were also calculated.

RESULTS:

87 patients (48 benign and 39 malignant; mean [± SD] age 51 ± 17.9 and 57.1 ± 17.1, respectively) were evaluated. For all readers, pre-contrast and post-contrast sensitivities were 68.1 % and 70.6 % while pre-contrast and post-contrast specificities were 84.6 % and 83.8 %, respectively without significant change (p=0.88). There was not a significant association with the use of contrast and prediction of malignant potential with or without the resident reader (p=0.65 and p=0.82). Use of contrast was significantly associated with higher levels of reader confidence (p=0.02) for all readers. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities were in good agreement (W = 0.77 and 0.70).

CONCLUSION:

The addition of a post-contrast sequence increased reader confidence in their diagnosis without a corresponding significant increase in accurate prediction of malignant potential.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Sensibilidad y Especificidad / Medios de Contraste / Gadolinio Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Curr Probl Diagn Radiol / Curr. probl. diagn. radiol / Current problems in diagnostic radiology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Sensibilidad y Especificidad / Medios de Contraste / Gadolinio Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Curr Probl Diagn Radiol / Curr. probl. diagn. radiol / Current problems in diagnostic radiology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos