Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Compatibility versus reaction diffusion: Factors that determine the heterogeneity of polymerized adhesive networks.
Fu, Denghao; Holles, Sarah Beth; England, Emily; Zhang, Yunlu; Cheng, Shiwang; Szczepanski, Caroline.
Afiliación
  • Fu D; Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA.
  • Holles SB; Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA.
  • England E; Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA.
  • Cheng S; Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA.
  • Szczepanski C; Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48824, USA. Electronic address: szcz@msu.edu.
Dent Mater ; 40(5): 800-810, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485599
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Heterogeneity and phase separation during network polymerization is a major issue contributing to the failure of dental adhesives. This study investigates how the ratio of hydrophobic crosslinkers to hydrophilic comonomer (C/H ratio), as well as cosolvent fraction (ethanol/water) influences the degree of heterogeneity and proclivity for phase separation in a series of model adhesive formulations.

METHODS:

Twelve formulations were investigated, with 4 different C/H ratios (71, 2.21, 11, 0.51) and 3 different overall cosolvent fractions (0, 10 and 20 wt%). The heterogeneity and phase behavior were characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) and atomic force microscopy (AFM).

RESULTS:

In resins without cosolvent, all characterizations confirm reduced heterogeneity as C/H ratio decreases. However, when 10 or 20 wt% of cosolvent is included in the adhesive formulation, a higher degree of heterogeneity and even distinct phase separation with domains ranging from a few hundreds of nanometers to a few micrometers in size form. This is particularly noticeable at lower C/H ratios, which is surprising as HEMA is commonly considered a compatibilizer between hydrophobic crosslinkers and aqueous (co)solvents.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Our experiments demonstrate that formulations with lower C/H ratio and thus a lower viscosity experience later onsets of diffusion limitations during polymerization, which favors thermodynamically driven phase separation. Therefore, to determine or predict the resulting phase structure of adhesive materials, it is necessary to consider the kinetics and diffusion constraints during the formation of the polymer network and not just the compatibility of resin constituents.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayo de Materiales / Microscopía de Fuerza Atómica / Polimerizacion Idioma: En Revista: Dent Mater Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayo de Materiales / Microscopía de Fuerza Atómica / Polimerizacion Idioma: En Revista: Dent Mater Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos