Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
House dust mite sublingual allergen immunotherapy tablet is safe and well-tolerated in Dutch clinical practice.
Tempels-Pavlica, Zana; Aarts, Mark C J; Welsing, Paco M J; van der Meer, Akke-Nynke; van der Zwan, Leonard P; Uss, Elena; Knulst, André C.
Afiliación
  • Tempels-Pavlica Z; Department of Allergology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Aarts MCJ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
  • Welsing PMJ; Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • van der Meer AN; Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
  • van der Zwan LP; Medical Department, ALK-Abelló BV, Almere, Netherlands.
  • Uss E; Medical Department, ALK-Abelló BV, Almere, Netherlands.
  • Knulst AC; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Allergy ; 5: 1355324, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38487467
ABSTRACT

Background:

Half (49%) of clinically diagnosed allergic rhinitis (AR) patients are sensitized to house dust mite (HDM). If allergen avoidance and symptomatic medication fail, allergen immunotherapy may be indicated.

Objective:

We investigated safety and tolerability of HDM-sublingual immunotherapy by HDM-SLIT tablets in Dutch daily clinical practice.

Methods:

Daily intake of 12 SQ-HDM SLIT-tablet was investigated in a prospective, multicenter, observational study (EUPAS43753). It comprised 4 consultations in 1 year. Data on safety, tolerability, treatment satisfaction, symptomatic medication, compliance, and clinical effectiveness (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test; CARAT) were collected. Descriptive and longitudinal regression data analysis were performed.

Results:

Adult patients (n = 415), mean (SD) age 36.6 (12.2) years, 61.4% female and 36% asthmatic were included. The preponderance (65.1%) experienced adverse events (AEs). These, mostly mild (67%), AEs comprised oral allergic reactions (58.6%), respiratory (12.4%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (9.4%). Sixty (14.5%) patients stopped due to AEs and 76 (18.3%) for non-AE reasons. CARAT scores improved clinically significant by 6 points and symptomatic medication use decreased from 96.1% to 77.4%. Most patients (74.5%) tolerated the treatment and were compliant (>86.5%). The majority of patients (62.4%) and investigators (69.4%) were satisfied with treatment.

Conclusions:

HDM SLIT-tablet is a safe and well-tolerated AR treatment. AEs occur often but are mostly mild and decreasing during the first year. CARAT scores improved and symptomatic medication use decreased suggesting better control of AR with treatment. Compliance, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction are good. However, patient follow-up and compliance remain important points of attention when initiating treatment.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Allergy Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Allergy Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos