Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-level language brain regions process sublexical regularities.
Regev, Tamar I; Kim, Hee So; Chen, Xuanyi; Affourtit, Josef; Schipper, Abigail E; Bergen, Leon; Mahowald, Kyle; Fedorenko, Evelina.
Afiliación
  • Regev TI; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Kim HS; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Chen X; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Affourtit J; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Schipper AE; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Bergen L; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Mahowald K; Department of Cognitive Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States.
  • Fedorenko E; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Cereb Cortex ; 34(3)2024 03 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38494886
ABSTRACT
A network of left frontal and temporal brain regions supports language processing. This "core" language network stores our knowledge of words and constructions as well as constraints on how those combine to form sentences. However, our linguistic knowledge additionally includes information about phonemes and how they combine to form phonemic clusters, syllables, and words. Are phoneme combinatorics also represented in these language regions? Across five functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments, we investigated the sensitivity of high-level language processing brain regions to sublexical linguistic regularities by examining responses to diverse nonwords-sequences of phonemes that do not constitute real words (e.g. punes, silory, flope). We establish robust responses in the language network to visually (experiment 1a, n = 605) and auditorily (experiments 1b, n = 12, and 1c, n = 13) presented nonwords. In experiment 2 (n = 16), we find stronger responses to nonwords that are more well-formed, i.e. obey the phoneme-combinatorial constraints of English. Finally, in experiment 3 (n = 14), we provide suggestive evidence that the responses in experiments 1 and 2 are not due to the activation of real words that share some phonology with the nonwords. The results suggest that sublexical regularities are stored and processed within the same fronto-temporal network that supports lexical and syntactic processes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mapeo Encefálico / Lenguaje País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Cereb Cortex Asunto de la revista: CEREBRO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mapeo Encefálico / Lenguaje País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Cereb Cortex Asunto de la revista: CEREBRO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos