Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of selinexor for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis.
Shafei, Laila; Bashir, Shaima; Chan, Esther W; Abushanab, Dina; Hamad, Anas; Al-Badriyeh, Daoud.
Afiliación
  • Shafei L; College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; Pharmacy Department, National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
  • Bashir S; College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
  • Chan EW; Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Abushanab D; Drug Information Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Hamad A; College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar; Pharmacy Department, National Center for Cancer Care & Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
  • Al-Badriyeh D; College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. Electronic address: daoud.a@qu.edu.qa.
Curr Probl Cancer ; 50: 101076, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537395
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral selective-inhibitor-of-nuclear-export, granted accelerated approval by FDA (2019) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We sought to quantitatively summarize the selinexor efficacy and safety in RRMM.

METHODS:

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinicaltrial.gov, and google scholar, until May 2023, studies about selinexor use in RRMM. The outcome measures of interest were primarily efficacy outcomes, in addition to safety outcomes. Random-effect model analyses were performed, at statistical significance of P<0.05, using the RevMan software.

RESULTS:

Meta-analyses of eleven included clinical trials yielded a significant 56.21% overall clinical benefit, 46.91% overall response, 4.89% complete response, 23.41% very good partial response, 24.68% partial response, and 28.06% stable disease rates with selinexor. Due to safety reasons, selinexor caused significant increase in discontinuation rate, 16.80%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher efficacy with selinexor plus dexamethasone and proteasome inhibitor combinations than with selinexor alone. The multiple myeloma type, high cytogenetic risk, refractory state, and advanced disease state did not affect performance. Risk of selection, performance, and detection biases were unclear in the included trials.

CONCLUSION:

Selinexor led to significant positive responses with an acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients, despite higher rates of safety-related discontinuations. Selinexor-based combinations further enhanced response.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Triazoles / Hidrazinas / Mieloma Múltiple Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Probl Cancer Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Qatar

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Triazoles / Hidrazinas / Mieloma Múltiple Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Probl Cancer Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Qatar