Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decision regret of cancer patients after radiotherapy: results from a cross-sectional observational study at a large tertiary cancer center in Germany.
Rühle, Alexander; Wieland, Leonie; Hinz, Andreas; Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja; Nicolay, Nils H; Seidel, Clemens.
Afiliación
  • Rühle A; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. alexander.ruehle@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
  • Wieland L; Comprehensive Cancer Center Central (CCCG) Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. alexander.ruehle@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
  • Hinz A; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Stephanstr. 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Mehnert-Theuerkauf A; Comprehensive Cancer Center Central (CCCG) Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Nicolay NH; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Seidel C; Comprehensive Cancer Center Central (CCCG) Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(3): 167, 2024 Mar 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546873
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The decision-making process regarding cancer treatment is emotionally challenging for patients and families, harboring the risk of decision regret. We aimed to explore prevalence and determinants of decision regret following radiotherapy.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center to assess decision regret following radiotherapy. The study employed the German version of the Ottawa Decision Regret Scale (DRS) which was validated in the study population. Decision regret was categorized as absent (0 points), mild (1-25 points), and strong (> 25 points). Various psychosocial outcome measures were collected using validated questionnaires to identify factors that may be associated with decision regret.

RESULTS:

Out of 320 eligible patients, 212 participated, with 207 completing the DRS. Median age at start of radiotherapy was 64 years [interquartile range (IQR), 56-72], genders were balanced (105 female, 102 male), and the most common cancer types were breast (n = 84; 41%), prostate (n = 57; 28%), and head-and-neck cancer (n = 19; 9%). Radiotherapy was applied with curative intention in 188 patients (91%). Median time between last radiotherapy fraction and questionnaire completion was 23 months (IQR, 1-38). DRS comprehensibility was rated as good or very good by 98% (196 of 201) of patients. Decision regret was reported by 43% (n = 90) as absent, 38% (n = 78) as mild, and 18% (n = 38) as strong. In the multiple regression analysis, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, low social support, and dissatisfaction with care were independent risk factors for higher decision regret after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

The German version of the DRS could be used to assess decision regret in a diverse cohort of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Decision regret was prevalent in a considerable proportion of patients. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and obtain causal factors associated with decision regret after radiotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toma de Decisiones / Neoplasias Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toma de Decisiones / Neoplasias Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Alemania