Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph, Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit using a mechanical shaker table.
White, James W; Finnegan, Olivia L; Tindall, Nick; Nelakuditi, Srihari; Brown, David E; Pate, Russell R; Welk, Gregory J; de Zambotti, Massimiliano; Ghosal, Rahul; Wang, Yuan; Burkart, Sarah; Adams, Elizabeth L; Chandrashekhar, Mvs; Armstrong, Bridget; Beets, Michael W; Weaver, R Glenn.
Afiliación
  • White JW; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Finnegan OL; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Tindall N; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Nelakuditi S; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Brown DE; Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Pediatric Sleep Medicine, Prisma Health Richland Hospital, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Pate RR; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Welk GJ; Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
  • de Zambotti M; SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, United States of America.
  • Ghosal R; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Wang Y; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Burkart S; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Adams EL; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Chandrashekhar M; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Armstrong B; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Beets MW; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
  • Weaver RG; Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0286898, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551940
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the raw accelerometry output from research-grade and consumer wearable devices compared to accelerations produced by a mechanical shaker table. Raw accelerometry data from a total of 40 devices (i.e., n = 10 ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, n = 10 Apple Watch Series 7, n = 10 Garmin Vivoactive 4S, and n = 10 Fitbit Sense) were compared to reference accelerations produced by an orbital shaker table at speeds ranging from 0.6 Hz (4.4 milligravity-mg) to 3.2 Hz (124.7mg). Two-way random effects absolute intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) tested inter-device reliability. Pearson product moment, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), absolute error, mean bias, and equivalence testing were calculated to assess the validity between the raw estimates from the devices and the reference metric. Estimates from Apple, ActiGraph, Garmin, and Fitbit were reliable, with ICCs = 0.99, 0.97, 0.88, and 0.88, respectively. Estimates from ActiGraph, Apple, and Fitbit devices exhibited excellent concordance with the reference CCCs = 0.88, 0.83, and 0.85, respectively, while estimates from Garmin exhibited moderate concordance CCC = 0.59 based on the mean aggregation method. ActiGraph, Apple, and Fitbit produced similar absolute errors = 16.9mg, 21.6mg, and 22.0mg, respectively, while Garmin produced higher absolute error = 32.5mg compared to the reference. ActiGraph produced the lowest mean bias 0.0mg (95%CI = -40.0, 41.0). Equivalence testing revealed raw accelerometry data from all devices were not statistically significantly within the equivalence bounds of the shaker speed. Findings from this study provide evidence that raw accelerometry data from Apple, Garmin, and Fitbit devices can be used to reliably estimate movement; however, no estimates were statistically significantly equivalent to the reference. Future studies could explore device-agnostic and harmonization methods for estimating physical activity using the raw accelerometry signals from the consumer wearables studied herein.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acelerometría / Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acelerometría / Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos