Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence to Aid Decision-Making in Kidney Allocation.
Ali, Hatem; Mohamed, Mahmoud; Molnar, Miklos Z; Fülöp, Tibor; Burke, Bernard; Shroff, Arun; Shroff, Sunil; Briggs, David; Krishnan, Nithya.
Afiliación
  • Ali H; From the University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire, United Kingdom.
  • Mohamed M; University Hospitals of Mississippi.
  • Molnar MZ; Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Fülöp T; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University Hospitals of South Carolina.
  • Burke B; Medicine Service, Ralph H Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Shroff A; Research Centre for Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
  • Shroff S; Xtend.AI, Medindia.net, MOHAN Foundation.
  • Briggs D; Xtend.AI, Medindia.net, MOHAN Foundation.
  • Krishnan N; Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
ASAIO J ; 2024 Mar 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38552178
ABSTRACT
In kidney transplantation, pairing recipients with the highest longevity with low-risk allografts to optimize graft-donor survival is a complex challenge. Current risk prediction models exhibit limited discriminative and calibration capabilities and have not been compared to modern decision-assisting tools. We aimed to develop a highly accurate risk-stratification index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Using data from the UNOS database (156,749 deceased kidney transplants, 2007-2021), we randomly divided transplants into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. The primary measure was death-censored graft survival. Four machine learning models were assessed for calibration (integrated Brier score [IBS]) and discrimination (time-dependent concordance [CTD] index), compared with existing models. We conducted decision curve analysis and external validation using UK Transplant data. The Deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68 at 6, 9, and 12 years post-transplant), with CTD at 0.66. Calibration was adequate (IBS = 0.12), while the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) model had lower CTD (0.59) and AUC (0.60). AI-based D-TOP outperformed the KDPI in evaluating transplant pairs based on graft survival, potentially enhancing deceased donor selection. Advanced computing is poised to influence kidney allocation schemes.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ASAIO J Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ASAIO J Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido