Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of efficacy and safety of equivalent doses of remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscopy anesthesia in elderly patients.
Chen, Di; Liao, Min; Wu, Xiao-Ru; Zhao, Tang-Yuan-Meng; Sun, Hu.
Afiliación
  • Chen D; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
  • Liao M; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
  • Wu XR; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
  • Zhao TY; West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
  • Sun H; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China. sunhu09@163.com.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 7645, 2024 04 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561361
ABSTRACT
Remimazolam, a novel intravenous anesthetic, has been proven to be safe and efficacious in the gastroscopy setting among the elderly. However, reports comparing the effectiveness and safety of using equivalent doses of remimazolam with propofol have not been seen. The aim of this study was to compare the sedation efficacy and safety of the 95% effective doses (ED95) of remimazolam versus propofol combined with sufentanil in the gastroscopy setting among the elderly. In the first step of this two-step study, a modified up-and-down method was used to calculate the ED95 of remimazolam and propofol when combined with 0.1 µg/kg sufentanil in inhibiting body movement of elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy. In the second step, ED95 of both agents calculated in the first step were administered, endpoints of efficacy, safety, and incidence of adverse events were compared. A total of 46 individuals completed the first step. The ED95 of remimazolam was 0.163 mg/kg (95% CI 0.160-0.170 mg/kg), and that of propofol was 1.042 mg/kg (95% CI 1.007-1.112 mg/kg). In the second step, 240 patients completed the trial. The anesthetic effective rates of the remimazolam group and the propofol group were 78% and 83%, respectively, with no statistical difference (P = 0.312). Patients in the remimazolam group had more stable circulatory functions (P < 0.0001) and a lower incidence of pain on injection (3.3% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of hypotension was low in the remimazolam versus propofol group (15.6% vs. 39.0%, P < 0.0001). Overall adverse event was low in the remimazolam versus propofol group (21.3% vs. 62.7%, P < 0.0001).In this study, we found that when anesthesia was administered to elderly gastroscopy patients based on 95% effective doses of remimazolam and propofol, remimazolam was as effective as propofol, but was safer with a lower incidence of adverse events.Study registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000034234. Registered 29/06/2020, https//www.chictr.org.cn .
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol / Anestesia Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol / Anestesia Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China