Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intra- and post-operative outcomes of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Erkan, Caglar; Inal, Hasan Ali; Uysal, Aysel.
Afiliación
  • Erkan C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Varlik Mh. Kazim Karabekir Cd., 07100, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Inal HA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Varlik Mh. Kazim Karabekir Cd., 07100, Antalya, Turkey. dr.hasanaliinal@yahoo.com.
  • Uysal A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Varlik Mh. Kazim Karabekir Cd., 07100, Antalya, Turkey.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 309(6): 2751-2759, 2024 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584246
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the effect of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol on perioperative and post-operative outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs) performed for benign gynecological diseases.

METHODS:

This prospective study was conducted with randomized 100 participants who underwent LH between 1 January and 31 December, 2022. A standard care protocol was applied to 50 participants (Group 1, control) and the ERAS protocol to the other 50 (Group 2, study). Length of hospitalization was compared between the groups as the primary outcome, and the duration of the operation, the amount of bleeding, post-operative nausea-vomiting, gas discharge time, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and complications as the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS:

No statistically significant difference was seen between the groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, operation indications, surgical procedures applied in addition to hysterectomy, operative time, pre-operative and post-operative hemoglobin levels, amount of bleeding, or drain use (p > 0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was observed in terms of nausea (60% vs. 26%, p = 0.001), vomiting (28% vs. 10%, p = 0.040), duration of gassing (17.74 ± 6.77 vs. 14.20 ± 7.05 h, p = 0.012), length of hospitalization (41.78 ± 12.17 vs. 34.12 ± 10.90 h, p = 0.001), analgesic requirements (4.62 ± 1.36 vs. 3.34 ± 1.27 h, p < 0.001), or VAS scores at the 1st (5.86 ± 1.21 vs. 4.58 ± 1.31, p < 0.001), 6th (5.16 ± 1.12 vs. 4.04 ± 1.08, p < 0.001), 12th (4.72 ± 1.12 vs. 3.48 ± 1.12, p < 0.001), 18th (4.48 ± 1.21 vs. 3.24 ± 1.34, p < 0.001), and 24th (4.08 ± 1.29 vs. 3.01 ± 1.30, p < 0.001) hours.

CONCLUSION:

The findings of this study show that the ERAS protocol has a positive effect on peri- and post-operative outcomes in LH. Further prospective studies are now needed to confirm the validity of the results.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía / Histerectomía / Tiempo de Internación Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía / Histerectomía / Tiempo de Internación Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Arch Gynecol Obstet Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía Pais de publicación: Alemania