Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chloroplast genomes of Caragana tibetica and Caragana turkestanica: structures and comparative analysis.
Liu, LiE; Li, HongYan; Li, JiaXin; Li, XinJuan; Hu, Na; Sun, Jing; Zhou, Wu.
Afiliación
  • Liu L; College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining, 810016, China.
  • Li H; College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining, 810016, China.
  • Li J; College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining, 810016, China.
  • Li X; College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining, 810016, China.
  • Hu N; Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Biological Resources, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, 810008, China.
  • Sun J; Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Biological Resources, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, 810008, China.
  • Zhou W; College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining, 810016, China. zhouwu870624@qhu.edu.cn.
BMC Plant Biol ; 24(1): 254, 2024 Apr 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594633
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The genus Caragana encompasses multiple plant species that possess medicinal and ecological value. However, some species of Caragana are quite similar in morphology, so identifying species in this genus based on their morphological characteristics is considerably complex. In our research, illumina paired-end sequencing was employed to investigate the genetic organization and structure of Caragana tibetica and Caragana turkestanica, including the previously published chloroplast genome sequence of 7 Caragana plants.

RESULTS:

The lengths of C. tibetica and C. turkestanica chloroplast genomes were 128,433 bp and 129,453 bp, respectively. The absence of inverted repeat sequences in these two species categorizes them under the inverted repeat loss clade (IRLC). They encode 110 and 111 genes (4 /4 rRNA genes, 30 /31tRNA genes, and 76 /76 protein-coding genes), respectively. Comparison of the chloroplast genomes of C. tibetica and C. turkestanica with 7 other Caragana species revealed a high overall sequence similarity. However, some divergence was observed between certain intergenic regions (matK-rbcL, psbD-psbM, atpA-psbI, and etc.). Nucleotide diversity (π) analysis revealed the detection of five highly likely variable regions, namely rps2-atpI, accD-psaI-ycf4, cemA-petA, psbN-psbH and rpoA-rps11. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that C. tibetica's sister species is Caragana jubata, whereas C. turkestanica's closest relative is Caragana arborescens.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study provides worthwhile information about the chloroplast genomes of C. tibetica and C. turkestanica, which aids in the identification and classification of Caragana species.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Caragana / Genoma del Cloroplasto Idioma: En Revista: BMC Plant Biol Asunto de la revista: BOTANICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Caragana / Genoma del Cloroplasto Idioma: En Revista: BMC Plant Biol Asunto de la revista: BOTANICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China