Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of menopausal hormone therapy beyond age 65 years and its effects on women's health outcomes by types, routes, and doses.
Baik, Seo H; Baye, Fitsum; McDonald, Clement J.
Afiliación
  • Baik SH; From the Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Menopause ; 31(5): 363-371, 2024 May 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595196
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The study aims to assess the use of menopausal hormone therapy beyond age 65 years and its health implications by types of estrogen/progestogen, routes of administration, and dose strengths.

METHODS:

Using prescription drug and encounter records of 10 million senior Medicare women from 2007-2020 and Cox regression analyses adjusted for time-varying characteristics of the women, we examined the effects of different preparations of menopausal hormone therapy on all-cause mortality, five cancers, six cardiovascular diseases, and dementia.

RESULTS:

Compared with never use or discontinuation of menopausal hormone therapy after age 65 years, the use of estrogen monotherapy beyond age 65 years was associated with significant risk reductions in mortality (19% or adjusted hazards ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.79-0.82), breast cancer (16%), lung cancer (13%), colorectal cancer (12%), congestive heart failure (CHF) (5%), venous thromboembolism (3%), atrial fibrillation (4%), acute myocardial infarction (11%), and dementia (2%). For the use of estrogen and progestogen combo-therapy, both E+ progestin and E+ progesterone were associated with increased risk of breast cancer by 10%-19%, but such risk can be mitigated using low dose of transdermal or vaginal E+ progestin. Moreover, E+ progestin exhibited significant risk reductions in endometrial cancer (45% or adjusted hazards ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.50-0.60), ovarian cancer (21%), ischemic heart disease (5%), CHF (5%), and venous thromboembolism (5%), whereas E+ progesterone exhibited risk reduction only in CHF (4%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among senior Medicare women, the implications of menopausal hormone therapy use beyond age 65 years vary by types, routes, and strengths. In general, risk reductions appear to be greater with low rather than medium or high doses, vaginal or transdermal rather than oral preparations, and with E2 rather than conjugated estrogen.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno / Salud de la Mujer Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Menopause Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Moldova

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno / Salud de la Mujer Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Menopause Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Moldova