Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Failure and complication rates of different materials, designs, and bonding techniques of ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses for restoring missing anterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen; Alghauli, Mohammed Ahmed; Almuzaini, Sarah A; Alharbi, Abdullah F; Alsani, Abdulrahman A; Mubarak, Arwa M; Alhajj, Mohammed Nasser.
Afiliación
  • Alqutaibi AY; Substitutive Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alghauli MA; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen.
  • Almuzaini SA; Prosthodontics Department, College of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen.
  • Alharbi AF; College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alsani AA; College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Mubarak AM; College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alhajj MN; College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al-Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 2024 Apr 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623053
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The objective of this review was to assess clinical trials that have examined the materials, design, and bonding of ceramic cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) as a potential option for replacing missing anterior teeth. The evaluation primarily focuses on the rate of restoration failure and clinical complications. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A thorough search of databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted. The most recent search was performed in October 2023. Clinical studies that compared ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs with double retainers or cantilevered RBFDPs using different ceramic materials or bonding systems were included. The outcome measures considered were restoration failure and complication rates.

RESULTS:

Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled data showed a statistically significant decrease in complication events when using cantilever designs compared with double retainer designs (p < 0.05); however, there were no differences found between the two designs in terms of restoration failure. The complication and failure rate of cantilever RBFDPs did not show a statistically significant difference with or without ceramic primer application before luting with phosphate monomer-containing luting resin (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs have lower complication rates compared with those with double retainers. The use of a ceramic primer prior to luting composite resin for ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs decreases the occurrence of complications and failures, although this effect was not statistically significant. Additional research is required to confirm these findings. Glass ceramic cantilever RBFDPs showed a decrease in success after 6 years, requiring ongoing monitoring, but both zirconia and glass-infiltrated alumina cantilever RBFDPs have demonstrated durability with excellent long-term success and survival rates for up to 10 and 15 years. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

Cantilever ceramic RBFDPs in the anterior region are a less invasive and valuable treatment option, providing good esthetic results.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Esthet Restor Dent Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Arabia Saudita

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Esthet Restor Dent Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Arabia Saudita